1999
DOI: 10.1007/s000240050228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Porosity and Saturation Degree by Laboratory Joint Measurements of Velocity and Resistivity: A Model Improvement

Abstract: This paper illustrates the laboratory procedures and experiments carried out on samples with different lithologies and reconstructed samples in order to test and implement an electroseismic model (CARRARA et al., 1994) which allows the evaluation of porosity and the saturation degree of rocks. The testing was conducted by comparing porosity (F) and saturation degree (S w ) values, obtained from measured resistivity (z) and elastic wave velocity (V P ) by means of appropriate formulations, with the values of F … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1994) proposed an electro‐seismic model by assuming all phases (matrix, clay, water and air) in the rock are contiguous, i.e., in parallel for the case of electrical conductivity and in series with regard to the propagation of elastic waves, for the purpose of evaluating porosity and saturation. The validity of this model was confirmed experimentally by Carrara et al . (1999).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1994) proposed an electro‐seismic model by assuming all phases (matrix, clay, water and air) in the rock are contiguous, i.e., in parallel for the case of electrical conductivity and in series with regard to the propagation of elastic waves, for the purpose of evaluating porosity and saturation. The validity of this model was confirmed experimentally by Carrara et al . (1999).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…2007) did not adequately describe our clay‐rich sandstone observations. Also, Carrara's electro‐seismic model (Carrara et al . 1999) did not match our clean sandstone results, although it showed the observed clay effect on the joint elastic‐electrical properties of our sandstones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we assumed the computed porosity to be the total porosity of the samples. Measurements performed by Carrara et al (1999) on samples from the Gravina formation are also included in this study. For these measurements, the resistivity of the saturating water was 78 ohm m. The data available for these samples included weight, length, diameter, dry-rock P-wave velocity, saturation and resistivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They implemented differential effective-media (DEM) modeling for sandstones with a range of P-wave velocities between 4.5 and 6 km/s, and normalized resistivities -measured resistivity normalized by the resistivity of the saturating water -between 10 2 and 10 5 ohm m. In contrast, previous velocity and resistivity measurements by Carrara et al (1999) for Gravina limestone samples showed normalized resistivity values on the order of 1 to 5 ohm m, and velocities around 2 km/s. They modeled both their velocity and resistivity measurements using the harmonic average of the solid and fluid elastic moduli and density for the effective elastic properties, and the harmonic average of their resistivities for the effective resistivity; this assumes very compliant and conductive rocks.…”
Section: Differential Effective Medium Versus Self Consistent Effectimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation