2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Plasma Phosphorylated Tau217 for Differentiation Between Alzheimer Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Subtypes Among Patients With Corticobasal Syndrome

Abstract: ImportancePlasma phosphorylated tau217 (p-tau217), a biomarker of Alzheimer disease (AD), is of special interest in corticobasal syndrome (CBS) because autopsy studies have revealed AD is the driving neuropathology in up to 40% of cases. This differentiates CBS from other 4-repeat tauopathy (4RT)–associated syndromes, such as progressive supranuclear palsy Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) and nonfluent primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), where underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is typically the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We combined CSF, plasma, and PiB PET imaging to divide the groups into AD positive and negative. Both CSF and plasma biomarkers have good sensitivity and specificity to detect AD pathology, 29,32,53 and plasma p-tau217 performs similar to CSF AD biomarkers and PiB PET imaging. 53 We acknowledge that we are introducing a new source of variability by using different types of biomarkers, but this approach allowed us to increase the sample size and potentiate the statistical power.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We combined CSF, plasma, and PiB PET imaging to divide the groups into AD positive and negative. Both CSF and plasma biomarkers have good sensitivity and specificity to detect AD pathology, 29,32,53 and plasma p-tau217 performs similar to CSF AD biomarkers and PiB PET imaging. 53 We acknowledge that we are introducing a new source of variability by using different types of biomarkers, but this approach allowed us to increase the sample size and potentiate the statistical power.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Abeta1-42, phosphorylated tau (p-tau181) and total tau (t-tau) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217), and PET scans with 11-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B ( 11 C-PiB) have been suggested as reliable biomarkers of AD pathology. [29][30][31][32] The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of AD-related biomarker changes on clinical features, brain atrophy, and functional connectivity of patients with clinical diagnosis of CBS and PSP. We expected an AD-like phenotype in patients with CBS/PSP that are positive for AD-related biomarker change (ie, cognitive impairment and relatively spared motor functions, atrophy in AD signature areas, and alteration in the DMN connectivity) compared to CBS/PSP without AD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 Another explanation for the differential patterns of synaptic loss could be the likely heterogeneous distribution and progression patterns of tau pathology in CBS-AD versus CBS-CBD/PSP. Although current blood biomarkers such as pTau217 levels or glial fibrillary acidic protein provide high specificity in differentiating between AD and non-AD dementias, 8,53 they do not reveal changes in specific pathological pathways or regions, but rather complement and enrich PET insights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have reported abnormal levels of GFAP and NfL in plasma or CSF in CBS, 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 and one study has shown that a plasma p‐tau measure can identify Aβ positivity within CBS. 50 However, it is unknown whether GFAP, NfL, or Aβ42/40 differ according to Aβ status in CBS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%