1991
DOI: 10.1097/00003072-199105000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Plantar Fasciitis by Three-phase Bone Scintigraphy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bone scintigraphy cannot differentiate plantar fasciitis from calcaneus stress fracture, osteomyelitis, or Achilles bursitis. 16,17 MRI allows direct imaging of the plantar fascia and can be used for the diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. 18 However, it cannot provide real-time imaging to guide steroid injection, and it is too expensive to be used for serial follow-ups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone scintigraphy cannot differentiate plantar fasciitis from calcaneus stress fracture, osteomyelitis, or Achilles bursitis. 16,17 MRI allows direct imaging of the plantar fascia and can be used for the diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. 18 However, it cannot provide real-time imaging to guide steroid injection, and it is too expensive to be used for serial follow-ups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would display a "Minimally Important Difference" 8 and answer the need for a pain scale that can uniquely assess pain exclusive to PF for diagnosis and evaluation. 2,6,8,11,15,18 In this study the PFPS has effectively discriminated pain unique to PF patients vs. heel pain caused by other foot pathologies. A future study should be conducted using this PFPS to measure changes in PF patients' pain through a treatment regime, lasting several months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2,6,8,11,15,18 Landorf and Radford question the statistical significance in changes with the VAS because of the multiple confounding variables associated with that test. They determined that a "Minimally Important Difference" was based not on statistical values alone but changes in "the effect a disorder has on the patient's life in general".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would display a "minimally important difference" and answer the need for a pain scale that can uniquely assess pain exclusive to PF for diagnosis and evaluation. [21][22][23][24][25][26] In this study the PFPS has effectively discriminated pain unique to PF patients vs. heel pain caused by other foot pathologies. Hence PFPS was chosen as the outcome measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…20 Current studies support the need for a pain scale that can uniquely assess pain exclusive to PF for diagnosis and assessment. [21][22][23][24][25][26] Landorf and Radford question the statistical significance in changes with the VAS because of the multiple confounding variables associated with that test. They determined that a "minimally important difference" was based not on statistical values alone but changes in "the effect a disorder has on the patient's life in general".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%