2013 36th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2013.6613901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of PHY layer throughput of ultra wide band IEEE 802.15.4a technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article also extends research described in [3] for IEEE 802.15.4a PHY (Physical Layer) real evaluation using the new RF transceiver which is intended to widely utilize in wireless sensor networks and precise distance estimation.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This article also extends research described in [3] for IEEE 802.15.4a PHY (Physical Layer) real evaluation using the new RF transceiver which is intended to widely utilize in wireless sensor networks and precise distance estimation.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 55%
“…For performance analysis of the SDS-TWR method the five reference positions (marked with numbers 32, 33, 34, 51, 53) inside the offices were used. Every measurement was carried out on the marked points (cross marker [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] hall between the offices, so we could evaluate different NLOS (non line-of-sight) multipath signal propagation. Figure 5 shows the worst case measurements in the whole area consolidated by all nodes, so we can see maximum possible error introduced in this environment using the UWB devices and then predict or deal with this occurrences.…”
Section: Non Line Of Sight (Nlos) Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the performance and the effect of the various communication mode parameters on the performance of the UWB communication have been addressed in multiple studies, none of the works known by the authors provides a comprehensive picture. E.g., in [19] and [20] the authors analytically characterized the effect of the rate, the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and the preamble length on the packet's on-air time and maximum throughput. The effect of the preamble length and the channel used on the communication distance was analytically studied in [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%