2018
DOI: 10.1109/tnano.2018.2845703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Photoacoustic Transduction Efficiency of Candle Soot Nanocomposite Transmitters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initially reported fabrication method involves the transplant of a spin-coated PDMS to the pre-deposited CS layer using two separate glass slides [22], because the uncured PDMS may remove the coated CS during the pouring and spin-coating. Later, it was demonstrated that direct spin-coating of PDMS on the CSdeposited glass does not cause serious damage on the CS layer by reducing the PDMS viscosity (1:100 weight ratio of toluene and PDMS) and gentle pouring [28], [29]. The detailed procedure starts with a flame synthesis using a paraffin wax candle (FIGURE 3A).…”
Section: Fabrication Of Csnp-pdms and Other Composite Transmittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The initially reported fabrication method involves the transplant of a spin-coated PDMS to the pre-deposited CS layer using two separate glass slides [22], because the uncured PDMS may remove the coated CS during the pouring and spin-coating. Later, it was demonstrated that direct spin-coating of PDMS on the CSdeposited glass does not cause serious damage on the CS layer by reducing the PDMS viscosity (1:100 weight ratio of toluene and PDMS) and gentle pouring [28], [29]. The detailed procedure starts with a flame synthesis using a paraffin wax candle (FIGURE 3A).…”
Section: Fabrication Of Csnp-pdms and Other Composite Transmittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photoacoustic energy conversion efficiency can be determined by eq. 4, where ρ, c, A, and p denote water density, sound speed of water, the acoustic aperture area which can be considered as the laser beam size, and pressure amplitude measured by a hydrophone, respectively [29]. E a is the acoustic energy, and E optical is the input laser pulse energy.…”
Section: Carbon-composite Transmittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Optical ultrasound sources typically employ Q-switched lasers emitting light pulses with durations of a few nanoseconds, corresponding to optical bandwidths exceeding 100 MHz. This light is converted into ultrasound in an optically absorbing structure; to date the most efficient optical ultrasound generators reported used nanocomposites comprising functionalised multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWC-NTs) [13], [17] or candle soot particles [18] as optical absorbers. These optical absorbers were embedded in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) acting as an elastomeric host with a high thermal expansion coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%