2017
DOI: 10.9734/csji/2017/28976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Performance of Corrosion Inhibitors Using Adsorption Isotherm Models: An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained value of 9 decreases with increase in temperature which implies that the binding strength weakens with increase in temperaturepossibility of desorption of inhibitor molecules. This trend coupled with values of ∆< 6=> less negative than -40 kJmol -1 obtained has been associated with spontaneous physical adsorption mechanism [22].…”
Section: Adsorption Considerationssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained value of 9 decreases with increase in temperature which implies that the binding strength weakens with increase in temperaturepossibility of desorption of inhibitor molecules. This trend coupled with values of ∆< 6=> less negative than -40 kJmol -1 obtained has been associated with spontaneous physical adsorption mechanism [22].…”
Section: Adsorption Considerationssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The calculated values of µ (Table 3) for the inhibition of mild steel corrosion by different concentration of copper soap in the sulphuric acid solution afforded negative values of µ which indicate decrease in inhibition efficiency with increase in temperature. According to this model, this observation is associated with physical adsorption mechanism [22].…”
Section: Temperature Coefficient Of Inhibition Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, metallic surface become negatively charged because of the adsorption of counterions of electrolytes on the positively charged metallic surface. The two appositively charged species interact from each other by electrostatic force of attraction; therefore during initial stage adsorption, behavior of inhibitors on metallic surface obeys the physisorption mechanism . However, during the course of metal‐inhibitor interactions, the non‐bonding electrons of heteroatoms and π‐electrons of multiple bonds get transferred (charge donation) into the d‐orbital of the surface metallic atoms (eg, Fe) that results in the formation of coordinate bonding between them.…”
Section: Metal‐inhibitor Interactions: Coordination Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of free energy of adsorption obtained for Langmuir and Freundlich are close to each other (to the nearest whole number − 20 kJ/g), specifying good agreement with each other. The ease of adsorption on the surface of the coupons was elucidated using Freundlich isotherm, since the reciprocals of n are less than 1 [47]. However, the high values of K ads attributed to Temkin (i.e.…”
Section: Effect Of Inhibitor Concentration and Adsorption Isothermmentioning
confidence: 99%