2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Pediatric Near-Infrared Cerebral Oximeter for Cardiac Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…36 By Bland-Altman analysis (Figure 2) the mean bias and precision (±1SD) was 1.2% and 4.6%, respectively, with confidence intervals around the limits of agreement of 11.0% and −9.6%. Our findings are similar to that reported by Kreeger et al 37 , and despite the wide confidence intervals around the limits of agreement, the precision still allows for discrimination between normal ScO 2 levels and those associated with cerebral hypoxia-ischemia. 33 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…36 By Bland-Altman analysis (Figure 2) the mean bias and precision (±1SD) was 1.2% and 4.6%, respectively, with confidence intervals around the limits of agreement of 11.0% and −9.6%. Our findings are similar to that reported by Kreeger et al 37 , and despite the wide confidence intervals around the limits of agreement, the precision still allows for discrimination between normal ScO 2 levels and those associated with cerebral hypoxia-ischemia. 33 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…27,28,29 The significance of the cerebral oximeter can be further demonstrated by substituting equation 3 (assuming blood distribution to be 70% venous (Kv = 0.7), 30% arterial (Ka = 0.3), and negligible amount in the capillaries (Kc = 0) and ERROR assumed to be zero for the ideal case as suggested by Ito et al 11 ) into equation 6 and solving the ratio of CMRO 2 to CBF as a function of S ct O 2 (equation 7). normalCnormalMnormalRO2/normalCnormalBnormalF=false(SpO2SnormalcnormaltO2false)×normalK1+normalK2

Where K1 = (1.34 × [tHb]) /0.7

And

K2 = 0.003 × (P a O 2 − P jb O 2 ).

Solving equation 7 for S ct O 2 then becomes (equation 8): SnormalcnormaltO2=SpO2+false(normalK2normalCnormalMnormalRO2/normalCnormalBnormalFfalse)/normalK1 From this equation, it can be deduced that the S ct O 2 has a proportional relationship to S p O 2 and CMRO 2 and inversely proportional with CBF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fore‐Sight and Equanox – and for that reason the SenSmart, because the company states that both devices are based on the same technology – are sold as devices for measuring absolute tissue saturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%