2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of PDC bit ROP models and the effect of rock strength on model coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using traditional ROP models is a conventional approach in ROP management studies (Bezminabadi et al, 2017). Either as an assistant model for artificial intelligence algorithms or as a basic ROP management tool, they have been used repeatedly (Bahari and Baradaran Seyed, 2007a;Rastegar et al, 2008;Bataee et al, 2010;Sui et al, 2013;Formighieri and Freitas, 2015;Kutas et al, 2015;Soares et al, 2016;Hegde et al, 2019). In this section, the history of developing different ROP models is reviewed and they are categorized in different subsections of RCB and PDC bits and also empirical correlations.…”
Section: The History Of Rop Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using traditional ROP models is a conventional approach in ROP management studies (Bezminabadi et al, 2017). Either as an assistant model for artificial intelligence algorithms or as a basic ROP management tool, they have been used repeatedly (Bahari and Baradaran Seyed, 2007a;Rastegar et al, 2008;Bataee et al, 2010;Sui et al, 2013;Formighieri and Freitas, 2015;Kutas et al, 2015;Soares et al, 2016;Hegde et al, 2019). In this section, the history of developing different ROP models is reviewed and they are categorized in different subsections of RCB and PDC bits and also empirical correlations.…”
Section: The History Of Rop Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, instead of determining fixed values for the model coefficients, creating probabilistic distributions for these parameters were replaced which improved the performance of this ROP model significantly. Soares et al (2016) conducted a performance comparison study in Williston Basin, located in North Dakota. They compared the performance of three ROP models including Bingham (1964), Hareland and Rampersad (1994) and Motahhari et al (2010) in several formations.…”
Section: Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally, different traditional models were optimized to evaluate the ROP; these models were developed from regression analysis to assess the ROP based on various inputs, the accuracy of these models is significantly affected by the inputs considered [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bourgoyne and Young model considers a variety of influencing factors-mechanical parameters, hydraulic parameters, and formation parameters-and has been widely used in the prediction of ROP (Bahari and Baradaran Seyed 2007;Bahari et al 2009;Hua 2010;Rahimzadeh et al 2011;Nascimento et al 2015;Ahmed and Ibrahim 2019). Soares et al (2016) compared Hareland and Rampersad's model (Hareland and Rampersad 1994) and Motahhari's model Qinghai Bureau of Environmental Geology Exploration, Xining 810000, China (Motahhari 2008;Motahhari et al 2010) in three different sandstone formations, concluding that the former works best. Al-Abduljabbar et al (2019) established a robust ROP model using 7000 real-time data measurements from a carbonate formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%