2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5122(02)00188-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of patient information Internet web sites about menopause and hormone replacement therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the majority of floaters/light flashes information on the Internet was of poor or fair quality (69.4%). Similar results have been reported for websites addressing other diseases (2,7,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the majority of floaters/light flashes information on the Internet was of poor or fair quality (69.4%). Similar results have been reported for websites addressing other diseases (2,7,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These are important principles to ensure quality and reliability of site content (15,17) . Technical scores revealed that disease prognosis was frequently not addressed in the studied sites (44.9%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to other website reviews, the present findings echo varying-to-poor quality for other health (e.g. Croft & Peterson, 2002;Reed & Anderson, 2002) and mental health websites (e.g. Moore & Ayres, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…currency of information, readability and download time 5 PMDD WEBSITE REVIEW (Eysenbach & Köhler, 2002;Croft & Peterson, 2002) as well as with the specific health content provided (e.g. incomplete information; Reed & Anderson, 2002). Whilst a number of specific studies have examined the content and quality of women's health information online, such as menopause, (Reed & Anderson, 2002;Pérez-López, 2004), postmenopausal osteoporosis, (Pérez-López & Pérez Roncero, 2006), cervical cancer treatments (Selman, Prakash, & Kahn, 2006), and postnatal mental health (Moore & Ayres, 2011), to the best of our knowledge there has not been a review of PMDD information websites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aims of sites were often not immediately apparent, and the declaration of information sources and publication dates were also poor, giving users little opportunity to verify information provided, as reported about other health information online [24][25][26]. The website scores indicated room for improvement in both general quality and, in particular, information coverage.…”
Section: Analysis Of Websites For Information Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%