2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40825-018-0099-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Partial Flow Dilution Systems for Very Low PM Mass Measurements

Abstract: Particulate matter (PM) mass measurement methodologies were improved considerably with the application of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1065 for the 2007 standards for heavy-duty engines that emphasized PM. However, there is still a need to improve the understanding of and the confidence in mass measurements for light-duty vehicles, which are now being subjected to more stringent PM standards. The purpose of this study is to evaluate commercially available partial flow dilutors (PFDs), with a parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the direct PFD comparisons showed an absolute difference of − 0.046 mg/mi vs − 0.12 mg/mi for the FTP and − 0.11 mg/mi vs − 0.17 mg/mi for the US06. These absolute differences were actually less than those found during a more systematic evaluation of PFD and CVS differences that was conducted in conjunction with this study and is presented elsewhere [13]. Additionally, the PM emissions comparison did not seem to improve as the cleaning steps were performed, suggesting a bias between CVS and PFD remained even though the tunnel blank for the CVS decreased (15 to 3 μg) at cycle #3, as discussed in greater detail in the next section.…”
Section: Pfd Vs Cvs Comparisoncontrasting
confidence: 39%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the direct PFD comparisons showed an absolute difference of − 0.046 mg/mi vs − 0.12 mg/mi for the FTP and − 0.11 mg/mi vs − 0.17 mg/mi for the US06. These absolute differences were actually less than those found during a more systematic evaluation of PFD and CVS differences that was conducted in conjunction with this study and is presented elsewhere [13]. Additionally, the PM emissions comparison did not seem to improve as the cleaning steps were performed, suggesting a bias between CVS and PFD remained even though the tunnel blank for the CVS decreased (15 to 3 μg) at cycle #3, as discussed in greater detail in the next section.…”
Section: Pfd Vs Cvs Comparisoncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…The stability of the weighing conditions was also monitored with 5 Teflon reference filters, which were weighed at least daily and sometimes hourly, which showed standard deviations of between 1.0 and 2.0 μg. The PM emission results were background corrected based on average tunnel blank filter masses collected periodically over the course of the project, which included other separate studies that are discussed elsewhere [13]. Tunnel blanks were collected over a test with the same duration as the cumulative or individual FTP phases or US06 tests, but without exhaust flow.…”
Section: Pm Sampling and Mass Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To mix nanomaterials, the subject of implant applications had previously been established. The author is trying to say zirconium (YSZ) is a biodegradable, neutral ceramic with good compression, twisting, and hardness 6 . Because pressure causes the transition from a rhombohedral to a tetragonal structure, YSZ has a high execution strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%