2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of oxygen exposure levels and polyphenolic content of red wines using an electronic panel formed by an electronic nose and an electronic tongue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…580 mV and the cathodic wave at 380 mV. Taking into account previous studies in alcoholic beverages [17,29], these peaks could be associated to the presence of polyphenols. Voltammograms also showed an intense cathodic peak at negative potentials that can be associated to the decomposition of the water/alcohol mixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…580 mV and the cathodic wave at 380 mV. Taking into account previous studies in alcoholic beverages [17,29], these peaks could be associated to the presence of polyphenols. Voltammograms also showed an intense cathodic peak at negative potentials that can be associated to the decomposition of the water/alcohol mixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Potentiometric and voltammetric electronic tongues have been used to analyze a variety of foods and beverages [9,10,12,13], including drinks with low alcoholic content such as wines [14,15,16,17] or beers [18]. Regarding beverages prepared from apples, recently an e-tongue based on glassy carbon electrodes has been successfully used to compare taste profiles of ciders produced with different yeasts or to discriminate Polish commercial ciders [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that the e-tongue is more sensitive to the diffused oxygen than the e-nose. The combination of both techniques could detect not only the oxygen content, but also the polyphenolic level, which is related to the oxidation state of wines, which in turn is directly related to the organoleptic characteristics (Rodríguez-Méndez et al, 2014). …”
Section: E-noses and E-tongues In The Wine Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples found in the literature include e-tongues based on simple metallic electrodes used to detect bisulfites (Labrador et al, 2009) and e-tongues based on electrodes chemically modified with phthalocyanines (Arrieta et al, 2003) that correlate well with up to 24 chemical parameters, including excellent correlations with the polyphenolic content (measured as total polyphenol index) acidity (measured as pH or total acidity) (Parra et al, 2004; Apetrei et al, 2007; Prieto et al, 2011), oxygen concentration, or antioxidant capacity (Rodríguez-Méndez et al, 2014). …”
Section: E-noses and E-tongues In The Wine Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…including mass, optic, electrical or electrochemical transduction (Baldwin, Bai, Plotto, & Dea, 2011;Haddi et al, 2014;Riul, Dantas, Miyazaki, & Oliveira, 2010;Rodríguez-M endez, Medina, De Saja, Apetrei, & Muñoz, 2012;Sghaier, Barhoumi, Maaref, Siadat, & JaffrezicRenault, 2009;Sliwinska, Wisniewska, Dymerski, Namiesnik, & Wardencki, 2014;Smyth & Cozzolino, 2013). Arrays of electrochemical sensors have been successfully used to discriminate between wines with different organoleptic characteristics Cet o, Apetrei, Del Valle, & Rodríguez-M endez, 2014;Cet o et al, 2012;Gay et al, 2010;Gil-S anchez et al, 2011;Guti errez, Moreno-Bar on, Pividori, Alegret, & Del Valle, 2010;Parra, Hernando, Rodríguez-M endez, & De Saja, 2004;Rodríguez-M endez et al, 2014;Zeravik, Hlavacek, Lacina, & Skl adal, 2009) or grapes of different qualities (Guti errez et al, 2011;Moreno i Codinachs et al, 2008). It has also been established that arrays combining sensors and biosensors can be advantageous, as they bring together both the benefits of classical arrays of electrochemical sensors (which provide global information about the sample) with the specificity of the enzymeesubstrate reaction typical of biosensors Moreno i Codinachs et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%