2014
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of outcome and prognostic factors in extraosseous Ewing sarcoma

Abstract: These data of EES suggests that low hemoglobin and high WBC count adversely affect EFS. Overall outcome was significantly better for EES than skeletal primary tumors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
47
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
47
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports have suggested that there may be clinical differences between patients with EES and skeletal ES . For example, patients with extraskeletal disease have been reported to be older and have a propensity for axial tumor origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports have suggested that there may be clinical differences between patients with EES and skeletal ES . For example, patients with extraskeletal disease have been reported to be older and have a propensity for axial tumor origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for patients who present with overt metastatic disease or who relapse following initial therapy, survival estimates remain dismal. Common sites of Ewing sarcoma metastasis are the lungs, bones and bone marrow and metatastic spread can be detected at any time, including many years after initial presentation [4], [5]. Despite attempts to identify biomarkers of aggressive disease, it is still not clear why some patients never develop metastasis and others go on to relapse at distant sites despite experiencing initial clinical remissions [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As synovial sarcoma is a rare malignancy, a specific tumor marker has never been established. However, LDH is known to reflect the progression of sarcomas and is suggested to be a prognostic factor of sarcoma (15). In the present case, the LDH value reflected both the tumor size and progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%