Evaluation of Oregon's Graduated Driver Licensing program

Raymond, Paula; Johns, Michael M.; Golembiewski, Gary; Seifert, Rita Furst; Nichols, J. Quyen; Knoblauch, R L

doi:10.1037/e424152008-001

Cited by 4 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This latter finding is encouraging for DE in Oregon, especially since it is generally consistent with earlier positive findings by Raymond et al [27] in a NHTSA-funded evaluation of the Oregon GDL program. It is also consistent with a recent population-based evaluation of DE in Nebraska which also reported positive safety benefits [20].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

Evaluation of Beginner Driver Education in Oregon

Mayhew

Vanlaar

Lonero³

et al. 2017

Safety

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Although driver education (DE) is widely accepted as an effective teen driver safety measure and widely available in the United States, Canada and elsewhere, evaluations have generally failed to show that such formal programs actually produce safer drivers. To address the issue of safety effects as part of a larger investigation, two studies were conducted to examine whether the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)-approved DE program was associated with reductions in collisions and convictions. In the first study, DE status among a relatively small sample of teens who completed an online survey was not found to have a significant effect on collisions and convictions. In the second study, of a much larger population of teen drivers, DE status was associated with a lower incidence of collisions and convictions. On balance, this suggests that the safety effects of DE are either neutral, based on the results of the first Oregon study, or cautiously optimistic based on the results of the second study. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of making improvements in DE that are evidence-based, and the need for further evaluation to establish that improved and new programs meet their safety objectives.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

Evaluation of Beginner Driver Education in Oregon

Mayhew

Vanlaar

Lonero³

et al. 2017

Safety

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Young drivers and parents perceive that police enforcement associated with young drivers is not as effective as it could be. For instance, Raymond et al (2007) suggested that parents do not believe that police are taking the enforcement of young drivers seriously enough. The study also identified that young drivers perceive that the enforcement of restrictions by police was inconsistent (Raymond et al, 2007).…”

Section: Police and Enforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, Raymond et al (2007) suggested that parents do not believe that police are taking the enforcement of young drivers seriously enough. The study also identified that young drivers perceive that the enforcement of restrictions by police was inconsistent (Raymond et al, 2007). This fits with the work of McCartt et al (2013) who found that only 45.1 per cent of adolescent drivers with an intermediate licence in New Jersey surveyed perceived that police enforce the night time driving restriction either sometimes or a lot.…”

Section: Police and Enforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite police in Oregon indicating that they are serious about GDL enforcement (Raymond et al, 2007), police officers appear to have some concerns regarding the enforcement of GDL laws. This includes apprehensions with specific restrictions such as alcohol limits (Steenbergen et al, 2001), points limit (Steenbergen et al, 2001), the night-time driving restriction (Steenbergen et al, 2001;Agent et al, 2000) and the passenger restriction (Chaudhary et al, 2007).…”

Section: Police and Enforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This includes apprehensions with specific restrictions such as alcohol limits (Steenbergen et al, 2001), points limit (Steenbergen et al, 2001), the night-time driving restriction (Steenbergen et al, 2001;Agent et al, 2000) and the passenger restriction (Chaudhary et al, 2007). Research by Raymond et al (2007) highlighted that they believe the GDL laws are more complex than needed with the Goodwin and Foss (2004) study suggesting that police officers may be unaware of the finer details of the GDL system.…”

Section: Police and Enforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Young driver enforcement within graduated driver licensing systems: a scoping review

Bates

Rodwell

Matthews

2019

Crime Prev Community Saf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Young drivers have the highest crash rates when compared with other groups of drivers. One countermeasure that has successfully reduced these crash rates is graduated driver licensing. However, young drivers' compliance with graduated driver licensing requirements decreases as they gain driving experience. This paper systematically reviews the literature in order to identify how enforcement practices can be used to influence the compliance of young drivers within graduated driver licensing systems. The review identified 21 relevant studies with all bar one of these being conducted in the United States or Australia.Additionally, young drivers and parents perceive that police enforcement of young drivers within graduated driver licensing systems is inconsistent. As young drivers are more concerned about their parents finding out that they broke the road rules, there appears to be scope for greater parental involvement in this area. The use of P plates or decals for drivers on an intermediate licence may also help to facilitate police enforcement.

show abstract

Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map

Goel,

Tiwari,

Varghese

et al. 2024

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundRoad Traffic injuries (RTI) are among the top ten leading causes of death in the world resulting in 1.35 million deaths every year, about 93% of which occur in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Despite several global resolutions to reduce traffic injuries, they have continued to grow in many countries. Many high‐income countries have successfully reduced RTI by using a public health approach and implementing evidence‐based interventions. As many LMICs develop their highway infrastructure, adopting a similar scientific approach towards road safety is crucial. The evidence also needs to be evaluated to assess external validity because measures that have worked in high‐income countries may not translate equally well to other contexts. An evidence gap map for RTI is the first step towards understanding what evidence is available, from where, and the key gaps in knowledge.ObjectivesThe objective of this evidence gap map (EGM) is to identify existing evidence from all effectiveness studies and systematic reviews related to road safety interventions. In addition, the EGM identifies gaps in evidence where new primary studies and systematic reviews could add value. This will help direct future research and discussions based on systematic evidence towards the approaches and interventions which are most effective in the road safety sector. This could enable the generation of evidence for informing policy at global, regional or national levels.Search MethodsThe EGM includes systematic reviews and impact evaluations assessing the effect of interventions for RTI reported in academic databases, organization websites, and grey literature sources. The studies were searched up to December 2019.Selection CriteriaThe interventions were divided into five broad categories: (a) human factors (e.g., enforcement or road user education), (b) road design, infrastructure and traffic control, (c) legal and institutional framework, (d) post‐crash pre‐hospital care, and (e) vehicle factors (except car design for occupant protection) and protective devices. Included studies reported two primary outcomes: fatal crashes and non‐fatal injury crashes; and four intermediate outcomes: change in use of seat belts, change in use of helmets, change in speed, and change in alcohol/drug use. Studies were excluded if they did not report injury or fatality as one of the outcomes.Data Collection and AnalysisThe EGM is presented in the form of a matrix with two primary dimensions: interventions (rows) and outcomes (columns). Additional dimensions are country income groups, region, quality level for systematic reviews, type of study design used (e.g., case‐control), type of road user studied (e.g., pedestrian, cyclists), age groups, and road type. The EGM is available online where the matrix of interventions and outcomes can be filtered by one or more dimensions. The webpage includes a bibliography of the selected studies and titles and abstracts available for preview. Quality appraisal for systematic reviews was conducted using a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews, AMSTAR 2.Main ResultsThe EGM identified 1859 studies of which 322 were systematic reviews, 7 were protocol studies and 1530 were impact evaluations. Some studies included more than one intervention, outcome, study method, or study region. The studies were distributed among intervention categories as: human factors (n = 771), road design, infrastructure and traffic control (n = 661), legal and institutional framework (n = 424), post‐crash pre‐hospital care (n = 118) and vehicle factors and protective devices (n = 111). Fatal crashes as outcomes were reported in 1414 records and non‐fatal injury crashes in 1252 records. Among the four intermediate outcomes, speed was most commonly reported (n = 298) followed by alcohol (n = 206), use of seatbelts (n = 167), and use of helmets (n = 66). Ninety‐six percent of the studies were reported from high‐income countries (HIC), 4.5% from upper‐middle‐income countries, and only 1.4% from lower‐middle and low‐income countries. There were 25 systematic reviews of high quality, 4 of moderate quality, and 293 of low quality.Authors' ConclusionsThe EGM shows that the distribution of available road safety evidence is skewed across the world. A vast majority of the literature is from HICs. In contrast, only a small fraction of the literature reports on the many LMICs that are fast expanding their road infrastructure, experiencing rapid changes in traffic patterns, and witnessing growth in road injuries. This bias in literature explains why many interventions that are of high importance in the context of LMICs remain poorly studied. Besides, many interventions that have been tested only in HICs may not work equally effectively in LMICs. Another important finding was that a large majority of systematic reviews are of low quality. The scarcity of evidence on many important interventions and lack of good quality evidence‐synthesis have significant implications for future road safety research and practice in LMICs. The EGM presented here will help identify priority areas for researchers, while directing practitioners and policy makers towards proven interventions.

show abstract

Evaluation of Oregon's Graduated Driver Licensing program

Cited by 4 publications

References 12 publications

Evaluation of Beginner Driver Education in Oregon

Evaluation of Beginner Driver Education in Oregon

Young driver enforcement within graduated driver licensing systems: a scoping review

Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About