2016
DOI: 10.7869/djo.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Opposite Clear Corneal Incision in Controlling Astigmatism in Cataract Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study, astigmatism reduction was found to be statistically significant in both WTR and ATR groups ( P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in preoperative astigmatism reduction between the two groups, 21 which is not consistent with the present study conducted by our clinicians.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study, astigmatism reduction was found to be statistically significant in both WTR and ATR groups ( P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in preoperative astigmatism reduction between the two groups, 21 which is not consistent with the present study conducted by our clinicians.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, a significant difference was found between the WTR and ATR groups in reducing the severity of astigmatism ( P = 0.02). An investigation by Bhalla et al 21 divided patients into three groups: No preoperative astigmatism, a WTR group, and an ATR group. In each patient group, there were 15 eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean magnitude of SIA was 0.403 AE 0.183 D in our CCI group, which was less than Khokhar's study (0.85 AE 0.75 D) 11 and Nemeth's study (0.61 AE 0.43 D) 14 but more than Bazzazi's study (0.036 AE 0.51 D) 13 and Bhalla's study (0.33 AE 0.22 D). 9 Regarding the OCCI group of our study, the mean magnitude of SIA was 0.849 AE 0.519 D, which was less than that of Lever and Dahn's study (2.25 D), 5 Tedros' study (1.57 D), 12 Qammar and Mullaney's study (2.10 D), 10 Nemeth's study (0.99 D) 14 and Khokhar's study (1.66 D). 11 On contrary, the mean SIA of our OCCI was higher than that of Bazzazi's study (0.505 D), and Bhalla's study (0.76 D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 On contrary, the mean SIA of our OCCI was higher than that of Bazzazi's study (0.505 D), and Bhalla's study (0.76 D). 9 All the above differences in the resulted mean change in astigmatism and SIA could be the result of using 2.8 mm incisions in our study compared to 3.2 mm incisions used in most of the studies that corrected a higher astigmatism than we did, or may be due to different sample sizes, postoperative topographic astigmatism (1.37 D in our study versus 3.6 D in other studies), and follow up period (one month versus 2-3 months in others).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 70% of cataract population has at least 1.00D of astigmatism & 33% of patients undergoing cataract surgery are eligible for treatment of pre-existing astigmatism. (14). Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery is 67.7% corneal astigmatism between 0.25 & 1.25 D, 27.5% was 1.25D or higher and 4.8% has less than 0.25 D of corneal astigmatism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%