Evaluation of operational, economic, and environmental performance of mixed and selective collection of municipal solid waste: Porto case study

Abstract

This article describes an accurate methodology for an operational, economic, and environmental assessment of municipal solid waste collection. The proposed methodological tool uses key performance indicators to evaluate independent operational and economic efficiency and performance of municipal solid waste collection practices. These key performance indicators are then used in life cycle inventories and life cycle impact assessment. Finally, the life cycle assessment environmental profiles provide the environmental assessment. We also report a successful application of this tool through a case study in the Portuguese city of Porto. Preliminary results demonstrate the applicability of the methodological tool to real cases. Some of the findings focus a significant difference between average mixed and selective collection effective distance (2.14 km t(-1); 16.12 km t(-1)), fuel consumption (3.96 L t(-1); 15.37 L t(-1)), crew productivity (0.98 t h(-1) worker(-1); 0.23 t h(-1) worker(-1)), cost (45.90 € t(-1); 241.20 € t(-1)), and global warming impact (19.95 kg CO2eq t(-1); 57.47 kg CO2eq t(-1)). Preliminary results consistently indicate: (a) higher global performance of mixed collection as compared with selective collection; (b) dependency of collection performance, even in urban areas, on the waste generation rate and density; (c) the decline of selective collection performances with decreasing source-separated material density and recycling collection rate; and (d) that the main threats to collection route efficiency are the extensive collection distances, high fuel consumption vehicles, and reduced crew productivity.

Policy Impact on Economic Viability of Biomass Gasification Systems in Indonesia

“…Moreover, the collection and transportation of waste are important parts of waste disposal. In fact, ineffective waste collection can cause problems to local inhabitants such as undesirable odour, visual impact and other health related issues [22]. If this waste can be utilized locally instead of being disposed at the municipality level, these issues can be lessened.…”

Life Cycle Assessment of SEWGS Technology Applied to Integrated Steel Plants

“…The ODP impact indicator has low and close values for all of the cases under investigation. The highest value (e.g., 15.82 × 10 −10 kg R11 equivalents/tHRC) is registered for the Reference Case; an additional impact to this impact category compared to the other cases is brought by the MEA production and transportation process.…”

“…The ODP impact indicator has low and close values for all of the cases under investigation. The highest value (e.g., 15.82 × 10 −10 kg R11 equivalents/t HRC ) is registered for the Reference Case;…”

“…LCA can be used for decision making in product and process (re)design by identifying what materials or processes have the lowest environmental impact. LCA can also give answers regarding how these materials and techniques can become friendlier to the environment [13], and how sustainability can be improved [14,15]. Therefore, LCA is a vital and powerful decision support tool in sustainable development [16].…”

The Diffusion Effect of MSW Recycling

“…Waste recycling in general yields some benefits: resource recovery, the saving of MSW disposal and transportation costs, the assurance of environmental cleaning and the extension of the life spans of MSW disposal facilities. And thus, an improvement in MSW recycling performance should be focused in addition to the efficiency enhancement of MSW management relating to MSW disposal facilities [3][4][5].…”