Evaluation of Open Source Software for Testing Performance of Web Applications

Maila-Maila, Fernando; Intriago-Pazmiño, Monserrate; Ibarra-Fiallo, Julio

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16184-2_8

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To determine the performance of the RESTful web services created, Gatling 4 has been used, which is a load and performance test framework [18]. For the evaluation, 4 scenarios with 1,000, 2,000, 5,000 and 10,000 concurrent users have been proposed.…”

Section: Performance and Loading Of The Web Servicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A model-driven engineering approach for the service integration of IoT systems

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the development of IoT devices and web services, the objects of the real world are more interconnected, which allows applications to extend their characteristics in different fields, including industrial or home environments, among other possible examples such as health, trade, transport, or agriculture. However, this development highlights the challenge of interoperability, because devices are heterogeneous and use different communication protocols and different data formats. For this reason, we propose a model for pointto-point integration in three-layer IoT applications: (a) hardware, which corresponds to the physical objects (controller, sensor and actuator), (b) communication, which is the bridge that allows the exchange of data between a MQTT [36] queue and REST web services, and (c) integration, which establishes a sequence of transactions to coordinate the components of the system. For this purpose, a metamodel, a graphic editor and a code generator have been developed that allow the developer to design IoT systems formed by heterogeneous components without having in-depth knowledge of every hardware and software platform. In order to

show abstract

Section: Performance and Loading Of The Web Servicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A model-driven engineering approach for the service integration of IoT systems

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are few works on how to select an LRS. Some vendors, for example, LL 5 , watershed LRS 6 and waxLRS 11 provide on their websites case studies and demos concerning the adoption of their systems. Further, some vendors provide white papers that discuss how to choose the LRS partner and what questions need be asked to evaluate the LRS products.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Multiple LRS products have made their appearance in the market such as Learning Locker 5 , Watershed LRS 6 and Trax 7 . The competition, in terms of being the market leader, is high.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, for a specific organization, choosing the appropriate LRS is of high importance, since adopting a non-optimized one may lead to both monetary and data losses. There exist many tools [1][4] [5] that can be used to run performance tests in order to select the appropriate LRS. However, the test settings need to be constantly edited to run different scenarios.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Operational Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Learning Record Stores

Labba

Roussanaly

Boyer

2020

Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, Learning Record Stores (LRS) are increasingly used within digital learning systems to store learning experiences. Multiple LRS software have made their appearance in the market. These systems provide the same basic functional features including receiving, storing and retrieving learning records. Further, some of them may offer varying features like visualization functions and interfacing with various external systems. However, the non-functional requirements such as scalability, response time and throughput may differ from one LRS to another. Thus, for a specific organization, choosing the appropriate LRS is of high importance, since adopting a non-optimized one in terms of non-functional requirements may lead to a loss of money, time and effort. In this paper, we focus on the performance aspect and we introduce an operational framework for analyzing the performance behaviour of LRS under a set of test scenarios. Moreover, the use of our framework provides the user with the possibility to choose the suitable strategy for sending storing requests to optimize their processing while taking into account the underlying infrastructure. A set of metrics are used to provide performance measurements at the end of each test. To validate our framework, we studied and analyzed the performances of two open source LRS including Learning Locker and Trax.

show abstract

“…Tabla 6. Herramientas más conocidas para automatización de pruebas de capacidad [89], [96]. Sin embargo, para incorporar las pruebas de capacidad en los entornos continuos, no basta con utilizar herramientas de automatización, sino que también deben convertirse en una etapa adicional del Conducto de Despliegue (ver Fig.…”

Section: Pruebas No Funcionalesunclassified

Modelo de mejora para pruebas continuas

Mascheroni¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La Entrega Continua es una práctica donde se desarrolla software de calidad de un modo en el que puede ser lanzado a producción en cualquier momento. Sin embargo, como parte de este trabajo de investigación se realizaron una revisión sistemática de la literatura y una encuesta, las cuales reportan que tanto la literatura académica como la industria todavía encuentran problemas relacionados con el proceso de pruebas al usar prácticas como Entrega Continua o Despliegue Continuo. De este modo, se propone el Modelo de Mejora para Pruebas Continuas como una solución a los problemas de pruebas en los entornos de desarrollo continuo. El mismo recopila propuestas y enfoques de diferentes autores que son presentados como buenas prácticas, agrupadas por tipos de pruebas y divididos en cuatro niveles. Estos niveles indican una jerarquía de mejora y un camino evolutivo en la implementación de las Pruebas Continuas. Además, una herramienta llamada EvalCTIM fue desarrollada para guiar la evaluación del proceso de pruebas utilizando el modelo propuesto. Finalmente, para validar el modelo, se empleó el método de Investigación-Acción mediante una evaluación teórica interpretativa seguida de estudios de casos llevados a cabo en proyectos de desarrollo de software reales. Los resultados demuestran que el modelo se puede utilizar como una solución para implementar las Pruebas Continuas de forma gradual en empresas con entornos de desarrollo continuo.

show abstract

Evaluation of Open Source Software for Testing Performance of Web Applications

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

A model-driven engineering approach for the service integration of IoT systems

A model-driven engineering approach for the service integration of IoT systems

An Operational Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Learning Record Stores

Modelo de mejora para pruebas continuas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About