Evaluation of Online Written Medication Educational Resources for People Living With Heart Failure

Ladhar, Simroop; Koshman, Sheri L.; Yang, Felicia; Turgeon, Ricky D.

doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2022.07.004

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Those scoring between 51% and 75% are categorized as displaying good quality with minor issues. Scores falling between 26% and 50% suggest serious quality issues, while content earning an EQIP score of 0%-25% is deemed to have severe quality issues 9,10 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of ChatGPT's Responses to Google Searches About Dry Eye (Preprint)

Sönmezoğlu Sr,

Güner Sönmezoğlu

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND ChatGPT may have the potential to provide detailed information in the field of health and even dry eye OBJECTIVE This study was to evaluate the text's quality, readability, and comprehensibility of the content generated by the ChatGPT about the most frequently searched queries on Google about dry eye disease (DED). METHODS The research employed Google Trends to discover the most commonly searched terms associated with DED. These identified keywords were then entered into ChatGPT, and the generated responses were evaluated for quality using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool (EQIP). The readability of the content was measured using both Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease (FKRE) parameters RESULTS The most commonly searched phrases were "eye drops," "dry eyes," and "dry eye drops." The countries that showed the greatest interest in these topics were the United States of America, Ireland, and the United Kingdom. The statistical analysis uncovered substantial concerns regarding the readability and comprehension of ChatGPT's written content about DED, indicating a necessity for enhancement. The low average EQIP value indicated the need to improve the quality and reliability of the content generated by ChatGPT. CONCLUSIONS The results of this indicated that the readability of ChatGPT's content on DED surpassed predefined standards but also highlighted concerns about its quality. Enhancing quality could be achieved by retraining the virtual intelligence with credible sources and verifying information through expert review can enhance the quality of the content.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%