2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of on-machine measuring method for dynamic stiffness of thin-walled workpieces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences of the natural frequency are 10 Hz in the bending mode and 50 Hz in the torsional mode. Further investigation revealed that this natural frequency difference appears because the mass of the tip of the piezoelectric actuator acts as an additional mass [19]. A larger equivalent mass of a workpiece results in a smaller natural frequency difference.…”
Section: Comparison Of Compliancementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences of the natural frequency are 10 Hz in the bending mode and 50 Hz in the torsional mode. Further investigation revealed that this natural frequency difference appears because the mass of the tip of the piezoelectric actuator acts as an additional mass [19]. A larger equivalent mass of a workpiece results in a smaller natural frequency difference.…”
Section: Comparison Of Compliancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The on-machine measurement of the dynamic stiffness of thin-walled workpieces using the conventional shaker method has been studied in our previous work [19]. The previous work investigated the influence of the shaker mass on measurement result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experimental based study provides a systematic measurement of process response parameters, videlicet the cutting force and surface roughness [13], dynamic stiffness measuring methods [14]. In addition, a special attention is paid to the system identification, signal, modal analysis, vibration absorption [15][16][17][18] using the frame structures as a test rig for numerical identification techniques.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%