2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Northern Hemisphere surface wind speed and wind power density in multiple reanalysis datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in supporting information Figure S1, similar spatial patterns of surface wind speed can be found in the three datasets, including high values in northern China and low values over the Sichuan Basin, south edge of Yunnan Province, and southeastern China. This spatial pattern is consistent with that in Miao et al (2020). Similar interannual variation and approximate values are also observed in the temporal evolution of these datasets, with the correlation coefficients between CN05.1 and HadISD/GSOD are 0.97/0.96, respectively, with p < 0.01 (Figure S2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in supporting information Figure S1, similar spatial patterns of surface wind speed can be found in the three datasets, including high values in northern China and low values over the Sichuan Basin, south edge of Yunnan Province, and southeastern China. This spatial pattern is consistent with that in Miao et al (2020). Similar interannual variation and approximate values are also observed in the temporal evolution of these datasets, with the correlation coefficients between CN05.1 and HadISD/GSOD are 0.97/0.96, respectively, with p < 0.01 (Figure S2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, few comprehensive studies on the surface wind speed over China have been conducted. In addition, compared to other climate variables, such as temperature and precipitation, wind speed has received less attention, partly due to the relatively poor representation of wind speed in the reanalysis data sets (Miao et al, 2020; Torralba et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2019; Zeng et al, 2019) and the scarcity of high‐quality observation data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reanalysis datasets, by combining observations and models, generate consistent wind time series at a complete spatial coverage and for this reason can potentially be used for such research (Dee et al ., 2011). Before using a reanalysis product for assessing wind changes, its capability to realistically represent surface winds must be evaluated against in‐situ observations since reanalysis dataset performance is strongly dependent on the selected region and the considered time period (Ramon et al ., 2019; Wohland et al ., 2019; Yu et al ., 2019; Miao et al ., 2020). Among the various reanalyses available nowadays, ERA5 (Hersbach et al ., 2018) is the new promising reanalysis dataset produced by the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miao et al. (2020) evaluated the biases of near‐surface wind speed in ERA‐Interim (the Interim European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis), JRA‐55, Climate Forecast System, and MERRA‐2. Among these reanalysis datasets, they found that JRA‐55 has the best performance in reproducing the spatial pattern of surface wind speed over the Northern Hemisphere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%