2009
DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.123109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Noninvasive Methods to Assess Wave Reflection and Pulse Transit Time From the Pressure Waveform Alone

Abstract: Abstract-Accurate quantification of pressure wave reflection requires separation of pressure in forward and backward components to calculate the reflection magnitude as the ratio of the amplitudes backward and forward pressure. To do so, measurement of aortic flow in addition to the pressure wave is mandatory, a limitation that can be overcome by replacing the unknown flow wave by an (uncalibrated) triangular estimate. Another extended application of this principle is the derivation of aortic pulse transit tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a triangular estimate of flow also circumvents the need for additional arterial Doppler measurements, although the accuracy of this approach has been called into question, and more physiologically shaped estimates of flow have been proposed. 28 As well as providing an estimate of reflection magnitude, 28 these techniques have been used to estimate carotid-femoral transit time, albeit with only a modest correlation. 28,29 However, it has been shown that, because there is an uncertain time delay introduced at the reflection site, it is not possible to know the true pulse transit time; thus, the site of reflection (and, hence, wave velocity) cannot be accurately determined.…”
Section: Methodsologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a triangular estimate of flow also circumvents the need for additional arterial Doppler measurements, although the accuracy of this approach has been called into question, and more physiologically shaped estimates of flow have been proposed. 28 As well as providing an estimate of reflection magnitude, 28 these techniques have been used to estimate carotid-femoral transit time, albeit with only a modest correlation. 28,29 However, it has been shown that, because there is an uncertain time delay introduced at the reflection site, it is not possible to know the true pulse transit time; thus, the site of reflection (and, hence, wave velocity) cannot be accurately determined.…”
Section: Methodsologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 This technique is widely accepted 14,23 and has been described in detail previously. 22,24 A wave reflection index (RIx) was calculated by dividing Pb by Pf as a measure of reflection magnitude (i.e. wave reflection magnitude relative to forward wave magnitude).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of this model in a separate group of 44 patients provided good agreement. 44 Data from the large population (>2500 patients, 35-55 years old) of the ASKLEPIOS Study, 45 however, did not confirm the accuracy of this approach when compared with Doppler aortic flowmetry. Moreover, derived measures of wave reflection showed only modest correlation with reference values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, derived measures of wave reflection showed only modest correlation with reference values. 45 According to these data, the simplified approach for flow wave reconstruction (the 'triangular approximation') could not be recommended for assessing pressure/flow relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%