2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of noncompliance in schizophrenia patients using electronic monitoring (MEMS®) and its relationship to sociodemographic, clinical and psychopathological variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
106
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
106
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…patients or psychiatrists), and five of these studies [AscherSvanum 2006;Janssen et al 2006;Novick et al 2010;Olfson et al 2006;Valenstein et al 2004] included more than 500 subjects. Countries where studies were conducted included Spain [Acosta et al 2009;Novick et al 2010], the USA [Aldebot and de Mamani 2009;Hudson et al 2004;Olfson et al 2006;Valenstein et al 2004;Weiden et al 2004b], Switzerland [Borras et al 2007], Germany [Janssen et al 2006;Linden et al 2001;Loffler et al 2003], Australia [McCann et al 2009], Denmark [Novick et al 2010], Italy [Novick et al 2010], Portugal [Novick et al 2010], Ireland [Novick et al 2010], the UK [Novick et al 2010] and Austria [Rettenbacher et al 2004]. Eleven studies [Aldebot and de Mamani 2009;Borras et al 2007;Hudson et al 2004;Janssen et al 2006;Loffler et al 2003;McCann et al 2009;Novick et al 2010;Olfson et al 2006;Rettenbacher et al 2004;Weiden et al 2004b] used subjective measures of adherence such as interviews and questionnaires completed by clinicians or patients, and four studies [Acosta et al 2006;Linden et al 2001;Valenstein et al 2004] used objective measures of adherence such as the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS, AARDEX Group Ltd., Switzerland) ...…”
Section: Factors Influencing Adherence Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…patients or psychiatrists), and five of these studies [AscherSvanum 2006;Janssen et al 2006;Novick et al 2010;Olfson et al 2006;Valenstein et al 2004] included more than 500 subjects. Countries where studies were conducted included Spain [Acosta et al 2009;Novick et al 2010], the USA [Aldebot and de Mamani 2009;Hudson et al 2004;Olfson et al 2006;Valenstein et al 2004;Weiden et al 2004b], Switzerland [Borras et al 2007], Germany [Janssen et al 2006;Linden et al 2001;Loffler et al 2003], Australia [McCann et al 2009], Denmark [Novick et al 2010], Italy [Novick et al 2010], Portugal [Novick et al 2010], Ireland [Novick et al 2010], the UK [Novick et al 2010] and Austria [Rettenbacher et al 2004]. Eleven studies [Aldebot and de Mamani 2009;Borras et al 2007;Hudson et al 2004;Janssen et al 2006;Loffler et al 2003;McCann et al 2009;Novick et al 2010;Olfson et al 2006;Rettenbacher et al 2004;Weiden et al 2004b] used subjective measures of adherence such as interviews and questionnaires completed by clinicians or patients, and four studies [Acosta et al 2006;Linden et al 2001;Valenstein et al 2004] used objective measures of adherence such as the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS, AARDEX Group Ltd., Switzerland) ...…”
Section: Factors Influencing Adherence Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 These subjective methods can be easily implemented in the clinical setting but have questionable accuracy and tend to underestimate nonadherence. 11,12 The currently available objective methods to assess patient adherence include pill counts, electronic devices that capture pill container openings such as Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) bottle caps, and pharmacy refill records. 13 Electronic bottle caps and smart pill boxes, often considered the gold standard for assessing adherence, 14 are limited to reporting the event of container opening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies. [36,33] reported the absence of association with type of disease. On the contrary, Mert et al (2015) found that non-adherence rate was significantly higher in patients with bipolar disorder when compared to other types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%