2012
DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.105013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of non-microbial salivary caries activity parameters and salivary biochemical indicators in predicting dental caries

Abstract: To conclude, within limitations of this study, it became clear that normal level of hydration and higher values for flow rate, pH, buffering capacity of saliva lead to good oral health and a reduced caries occurrence. Increased salivary viscosity plays a role in increasing caries incidence. Salivary biochemical indicators like calcium, phosphorus and alkaline phosphatase also play their respective role in determining caries susceptibility of an individual. These salivary parameters can be used as diagnostic to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
45
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Furthermore, various studies have shown that altered salivary pH, BC and ALP levels are associated with the formation or development of dental caries, gingivitis, periodontitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, diabetes, orthodontic tooth movements, cancer, abdominal inflammatory diseases and the early onset of menopause. 3,4,12,13,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] In the current study, salivary pH was lower among smokers in comparison to non-smokers; although the mean values found seem to reflect a minimal difference between the two groups (7.42 versus 7.52, respectively), even very small alterations in pH can influence salivary enzyme activity. 6 Additionally, BC was significant lower among smokers in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 Furthermore, various studies have shown that altered salivary pH, BC and ALP levels are associated with the formation or development of dental caries, gingivitis, periodontitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, diabetes, orthodontic tooth movements, cancer, abdominal inflammatory diseases and the early onset of menopause. 3,4,12,13,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] In the current study, salivary pH was lower among smokers in comparison to non-smokers; although the mean values found seem to reflect a minimal difference between the two groups (7.42 versus 7.52, respectively), even very small alterations in pH can influence salivary enzyme activity. 6 Additionally, BC was significant lower among smokers in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…11 High salivary pH and BC have been found to lead to better oral health outcomes and a lower incidence of dental caries. 12 Bagherian et al reported lower pH and BC values among children without caries. 13 In contrast, another study indicated lower resting salivary pH values among individuals with dental caries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume of stimulated saliva was then measured as described for the unstimulated saliva above and the flow rate calculated. The obtained flow rates were divided in three categories: very low (<0.7 mL min -1 , as diagnostic criterion for hyposalivation), low (0.7-1.0 mL min -1 ), and normal (>1.0 mL min -1 ) (26,27). Salivary sCD14 secretion rates (ng min -1 ) were calculated from the saliva volume (mL) in one minute and the corresponding sCD14 concentration (ng mL -1 ).…”
Section: Saliva Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This finding agrees with many other studies. 17,18,19 The results of this study showed that lower salivary inorganic phosphorus concentration of nursing caries children (10.99±1.37mg/dl) than that of the caries free children (11.916±1.390mg/dl) with statistical highly significant differences between them. On the other hand, a negative correlation between the salivary concentration of inorganic phosphorus in children with nursing caries and dmfs index was found, and the statistical difference was at highly significant level.…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 71%