2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-013-0577-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Neurosensory Disturbance Following Orthognathic Surgery: A Prospective Study

Abstract: Aim and Objectives The prospective study was to evaluate the incidence, type of neurosensory disturbance (NSD), grade its severity and monitor its recovery occurring in the lower lip and chin due to damage to inferior alveolar nerve following orthognathic surgery involving mandible. Materials and Methods The study included 10 patients who have undergone sagittal split osteotomy, genioplasty, and anterior subapical osteotomy (ASO). All the patients examined preoperatively and post operatively 1 week, 1 and 6 mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding agrees with previous studies, which show hypoesthesia as the commonest sensory disturbance after BSSO, endodontic treatment, local anaesthesia injection and post-procedural inflammatory process [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding agrees with previous studies, which show hypoesthesia as the commonest sensory disturbance after BSSO, endodontic treatment, local anaesthesia injection and post-procedural inflammatory process [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…2). Nerve damage resulting from trauma, local anaesthesia and endodontics result in transient nerve damage recovering over time [21,24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9,11,2 The present study aimed to assess the IAND with subjective tests and its relationship with 3D measurements of MC and fixation screws to evaluate the sensory loss following orthognathic surgery. In the literature, although there are studies reporting no significant difference between mandibular advancement or set-back surgeries with regard to IAND, 9,14,25 since the mechanism for damage (compression/stretching) is different, only the patients operated with mandibular setback surgery were included in the present study. Also, the contradictory results of genioplasty on IAND was effective in not including patients with genioplasty in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are studies evaluating IAND in the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months postoperatively, 11,12,25,27,33,34 however, according to Colella et al 35 incorrect results may occur before the postoperative first year. Therefore, patients were invited to the clinic for subjective evaluation at least 1 year after the surgery (20.43 ± 8.76 months on average) in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies are required to explore this relationship, as neurosensory disturbances after orthognathic surgery are relatively common and may affect patient QOL. 39,40…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%