2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of NDVI to assess avian abundance and richness along the upper San Pedro River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At some sites, our avian relative abundance estimates were relatively high compared to some studies (Rumble and Gobeille 2004;Mcfarland et al 2012); however, found similar avian densities along the San Pedro River. There are several reasons that account for the high avian relative abundances (> 40 individuals) detected at some sites.…”
Section: Hydrogeomorphology Vegetation and Birdssupporting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At some sites, our avian relative abundance estimates were relatively high compared to some studies (Rumble and Gobeille 2004;Mcfarland et al 2012); however, found similar avian densities along the San Pedro River. There are several reasons that account for the high avian relative abundances (> 40 individuals) detected at some sites.…”
Section: Hydrogeomorphology Vegetation and Birdssupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Yellow-breasted Chat was the most commonly detected bird (2,007 detections) and occurred at 67 sites. Spotted Towhee was the second most commonly detected bird (1,405 detections) and occurred at 66 sites; Mourning Dove was the third most frequently detected bird (1,053 detections) and occurred at 68 sites.Because the mode of relative abundance estimates produced fromRoyle's (2004) N-mixture models sometimes overestimated the maximum number of individuals detected at a site as compared to other southwestern avian studies(Rumble and Gobeille 2004;Mcfarland et al 2012), the more conservative first quartile of relative abundance estimates was used in analyses(Kéry and Schaub 2012). Different combinations of covariates were required for each species to achieve the model of best fit.Using New Mexico Partner in Flight Species Assessment scores, 5 species qualify as species of concern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models were built with environmental predictors that have been shown to play a role in shaping the distributions and/or abundances of birds at our spatial resolution, such as those expressing vegetation structure, primary productivity, topography and human impact (Seoane et al ., ; Mcfarland et al ., ). The vegetation structure categories were assigned to each transect based on an existing map of plant communities in the Canary Islands (Del Arco et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Providing spatially extensive, up-to-date information on biodiversity attributes has been problematic owing to the lack of direct measures from remotely sensed data of the occurrence of much of the biota. Finding a solution to this problem is important because on-ground surveys are costly, often require highly trained taxonomic experts and cover small areas only briefly (Mcfarland et al, 2012). Therefore, there is generally only sketchy information on the status of biodiversity (Muller & Brandl, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%