DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180814-4449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of nasal culturing procedures and immunization as applied to the control of Bordetella bronchiseptica rhinitis in swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1972;Farrington 1974;Nakase et al 1976) double s. c. vaccination of piglets was effective in restricting the development of pathological changes due to B. bronchiseptica. Inoculation into the nasal submucosa and i. p. immunization, on the other hand, proved to be only a mildly stimulating means of restricting the growth of B. bronchiseptica and the development of pathological changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1972;Farrington 1974;Nakase et al 1976) double s. c. vaccination of piglets was effective in restricting the development of pathological changes due to B. bronchiseptica. Inoculation into the nasal submucosa and i. p. immunization, on the other hand, proved to be only a mildly stimulating means of restricting the growth of B. bronchiseptica and the development of pathological changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nasal swab specimens were obtained from each sow just before farrowing and from each newborn pig at 3 days of age to determine if test swine were susceptible. The techniques for nasal swab specimen collection and the isolation and identification of B. bronchiseptica have been previously described (3,7,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%