2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017jc013186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of NASA GEOS‐ADAS Modeled Diurnal Warming Through Comparisons to SEVIRI and AMSR2 SST Observations

Abstract: An analysis of the ocean skin Sea Surface Temperature (SST) has been included in the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) ‐ Atmospheric Data Assimilation System (ADAS), Version 5 (GEOS‐ADAS). This analysis is based on the GEOS atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) that simulates near‐surface diurnal warming and cool skin effects. Analysis for the skin SST is performed along with the atmospheric state, including Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) satellite radiance observations as part of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diurnal warming signals from observations and these schemes match fairly well for moderate U 10 around 6 m/s with the bias less than 0.1 K. The majority of U 10 measurements fall in the range from 4 to 10 m/s. Under light wind conditions, all of the three schemes show large errors, which may be attributed to the inappropriate assumptions for extending the vertical temperature profile from the surface to a fixed depth when the subsurface mixing is weak (Gentemann & Akella, 2018); the ZB05 scheme shows the largest bias. For U 10 > 10 m/s, the diurnal SST variability is small due to wind‐driven mixing, and all schemes predict very small wind‐speed dependence, but there is a spread in the asymptotic values.…”
Section: Diurnal Warming Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diurnal warming signals from observations and these schemes match fairly well for moderate U 10 around 6 m/s with the bias less than 0.1 K. The majority of U 10 measurements fall in the range from 4 to 10 m/s. Under light wind conditions, all of the three schemes show large errors, which may be attributed to the inappropriate assumptions for extending the vertical temperature profile from the surface to a fixed depth when the subsurface mixing is weak (Gentemann & Akella, 2018); the ZB05 scheme shows the largest bias. For U 10 > 10 m/s, the diurnal SST variability is small due to wind‐driven mixing, and all schemes predict very small wind‐speed dependence, but there is a spread in the asymptotic values.…”
Section: Diurnal Warming Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This takes no account of the temperature gradient between the air-sea interface and in the upper 10 m and may introduce errors into forecasts (Beggs, 2010). New techniques apply cool-skin and warm-layer models on top of the standard ocean model configuration to predict the actual ocean skin temperature (Gentemann and Akella, 2018). Two-way airsea coupled weather prediction models have been developed, such as the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) 10 and the Met Office Unified Model Global Coupled Model 2.0 (Williams et al, 2015).…”
Section: Numerical Weather Prediction (Nwp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the tropics, diurnal SST range (dSST) is strong under weak winds in areas of convergence and between storms. These conditions are most common in the eastern tropical Pacific intertropical convergence zone, in the convergence of Western Pacific summer monsoon westerlies and easterly trade winds, and during phases of suppressed precipitation of tropical intraseasonal variability (Clayson & Weitlich 2007; C. L. Gentemann & Akella 2018) such as the Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%