2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-014-1170-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of muscle force classification using shape analysis of the sEMG probability density function: a simulation study

Abstract: In this work, we propose to classify, by simulation, the shape variability (or non-Gaussianity) of the surface electromyogram (sEMG) amplitude probability density function (PDF), according to contraction level, using high-order statistics (HOS) and a recent functional formalism, the core shape modeling (CSM). According to recent studies, based on simulated and/or experimental conditions, the sEMG PDF shape seems to be modified by many factors as: contraction level, fatigue state, muscle anatomy, used instrumen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For upper limb movement, most studies conducted have characterized hand and arm movements based on EMG signals recorded on the biceps brachii muscle during isometric contractions [65,76,99]. Later, biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles were selected in the analysis of motion pattern EMG signals in isotonic and isomteric contractions [29].…”
Section: Emg Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For upper limb movement, most studies conducted have characterized hand and arm movements based on EMG signals recorded on the biceps brachii muscle during isometric contractions [65,76,99]. Later, biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles were selected in the analysis of motion pattern EMG signals in isotonic and isomteric contractions [29].…”
Section: Emg Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we observe a low value of skewness in the middle of the grid. This reflects the contribution of the MU (at the center of the muscle) which is close to the detection system [2], [6]. Then with the increase of the contraction level from 20% to 50%-MVC we observe a clear increase in the skewness due to the effect of the new recruited MUs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Therefore, a single monopolar electrode or even bipolar detection system is hardly sufficient to obtain a reliable signal that reflects the muscle, because of the variability of surface EMG that's caused by a number of factors such as: the timing and intensity of muscle contraction, the distance of the electrode from the active muscle area, the electrode and amplifier properties and the quality of contact between the electrodes and the skin [1], [2]. Since EMG signals constitute a summation of the motor unit (MU) action potentials, it occurs within the detection area of the electrode constructive and destructive superimpositions highly dependent on the MU spatial distribution, causing a change in the sEMG amplitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations