2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aosl.2020.100016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of multiple surface irradiance-based clear sky detection methods at Xianghe—A heavy polluted site on the North China Plain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean atmospheric properties of each day are summarized in Table S1, with associated AOD and AE values represented in Figure S3. Table S1 also illustrates the performance and limitation of our clear-sky filter, which appears to work well under low aerosol loads, but less so for higher AOD values, in accordance with the results of Liu et al (2021) that assessed the performance of several clear-sky detection methods under various aerosol loads.…”
Section: Focus On Several Case Studiessupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean atmospheric properties of each day are summarized in Table S1, with associated AOD and AE values represented in Figure S3. Table S1 also illustrates the performance and limitation of our clear-sky filter, which appears to work well under low aerosol loads, but less so for higher AOD values, in accordance with the results of Liu et al (2021) that assessed the performance of several clear-sky detection methods under various aerosol loads.…”
Section: Focus On Several Case Studiessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This result is consistent with the effects of lower solar zenith angles and with the observation that aerosol Ångström exponent are on average slightly lower (by 0.06) in CSWC situations compared with CSKY cases, leading to a higher DRE efficiency as illustrated on Figure 10f. Note that the study of CSWC situations allows us to analyze conditions characterized by the Strong events class (see Table 2a), which were not identified as clear-sky either because of the presence of clouds or because of their high AOD values, as the clear-sky filter used in this study tend to erroneously misidentify CSKY conditions when the AOD is high (Liu et al, 2021). The aerosol DRE for the Strong events class appears very substantial for both direct (-260 W/m 2 , i.e.…”
Section: Focus On Several Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TSI-based sky discrimination results are further improved by manual inspection of raw TSI images to correct apparent errors, such as TSI misclassification of thin cloud into clear and misclassification of heavy haze into cloud. There are 307,995 clear samples and 441,810 cloudy samples in this study [18]. Each 1 min irradiance measurement is labeled with sky condition according to the corrected TSI measurements.…”
Section: Site and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TSI Analyser was applied to a 1-month dataset with 5-minute interval cloud images considering over 200,000 images collected at a 480 × 320 spatial resolution. These whole-sky images have been captured using TSI440 [84][85][86] used in previous research (e.g., [82,87,88]). The TSI440 instrument consists of a reflective dome with a camera suspended above it [89,90] pointing downwards to generate a .jpeg format colour image of the whole sky.…”
Section: Sky Image Processing and Cloud Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%