1999
DOI: 10.1109/7.766946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of multiple radar target trackers in stressful environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many fusion and tracking algorithms are available [3][4] which presents goddo performance in high clutter environment. Various technique of fusion process [5][6] should also be include in the study…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many fusion and tracking algorithms are available [3][4] which presents goddo performance in high clutter environment. Various technique of fusion process [5][6] should also be include in the study…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the conclusions of [20], comparing the performance of NN and PDA methods, in terms of both tracking performance and robustness, for a practical tracker in cluttered environment with real target data, enforces the selection of GNN as the data association method to be used by multistatic central station multiple target tracker. More details about GNN can be found in [16].…”
Section: Data Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sets formed after the procedure described above, are properly processed with the aid of NLSE and UT to obtain the initial estimate and covariance matrix of the new tentative tracks as presented in [20].…”
Section: Tentative Track Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations