2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of monophosphoryl lipid A as adjuvant for pulmonary delivered influenza vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the majority of the currently available influenza vaccines are administered via intramuscular or subcutaneous injection [5]. Injected vaccines generate strong systemic immunity but minimal mucosal immunity [6,7]. Moreover, injected vaccines can cause local reactions including pain, swelling and redness at the injection site, needle phobia, and transmission of infectious diseases due to needle stick injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of the currently available influenza vaccines are administered via intramuscular or subcutaneous injection [5]. Injected vaccines generate strong systemic immunity but minimal mucosal immunity [6,7]. Moreover, injected vaccines can cause local reactions including pain, swelling and redness at the injection site, needle phobia, and transmission of infectious diseases due to needle stick injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more balanced Th1/Th2 vaccine response is preferred as the combination of cellular with humoral immunity protects the host better against invading influenza viruses (Huber et al, 2006). Furthermore, although pulmonary influenza vaccines elicit local immune responses in the respiratory tract, their ability to induce intranasal IgA antibody titers are only modest (Audouy et al, 2011;Murugappan et al, 2013;Patil et al, 2014). A strong mucosal response in the nose and lungs is desired to provide maximal protection at the port of entry for the influenza virus (Renegar et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TLR agonists are already in practical use as adjuvants for a range of vaccines against viruses and other infections. The TLR4 agonist MPLA is used as an adjuvant for the malaria vaccine (25), and its use in animal models as a booster for influenza (26) and HIV (27) vaccines, as well as its direct effects in a model of P. aeruginosa cutaneous-burn infection and bacteremia (13), has also been reported. Furthermore, we recently reported that UT12 inoculation improved the prognosis for secondary bacterial pneumonia following influenza (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%