2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of monoclonal antibody based immunochromatographic strip test for direct detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 contamination in seafood samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through these test procedures, the result could be obtained within approximately 20 min after the sample had been introduced. Several methods for V. cholerae detection that have been published recently show a wide range of detection limits, for example, 10-100 CFU via PCR-based method by Mehrabadi et al [26], 10 CFU using a dipstick test by Chakraborty et al [27], and 5 × 10 5 cfu/mL through an immunochromatographic strip test by Chaivisuthangkura et al [28]. However, these limits could not be compared due to the different target analytes, detection reporters and antibody system used in each assay.…”
Section: Dot Fluorescence Immunoassay Stripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through these test procedures, the result could be obtained within approximately 20 min after the sample had been introduced. Several methods for V. cholerae detection that have been published recently show a wide range of detection limits, for example, 10-100 CFU via PCR-based method by Mehrabadi et al [26], 10 CFU using a dipstick test by Chakraborty et al [27], and 5 × 10 5 cfu/mL through an immunochromatographic strip test by Chaivisuthangkura et al [28]. However, these limits could not be compared due to the different target analytes, detection reporters and antibody system used in each assay.…”
Section: Dot Fluorescence Immunoassay Stripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at 30 days, both dilutions of bacterial suspension showed lighter immunoreactivity (Figure ). This result indicated that the strip could remain function under storage at room temperature equivalent to at least 2 years (Paek, Lee, Cho, & Kim, ), which is also similar to the shelved lives of strips for white spot syndrome virus (Wangman, Siriwattanarat, et al, ), yellow‐head virus (Sithigorngul et al, ), infectious myonecrosis virus (Wangman et al, ), V. cholerae O1 (Chaivisuthangkura et al, ) and V. cholerae O139 (Pengsuk et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…hepatopancreas, stomach, faecal) and environment materials, sample enrichment was needed before PCR analysis to increase VP AHPND detection effectiveness. After enrichment for 4–6 hr, the broth could be directly used as a PCR template (Han, Tang, Piamsomboon, & Pantoja, ; Sirikharin et al, ) and the detection limit of the bacteria was approximately 10 4 cfu/ml (Sirikharin et al, ), which was close to the detection limit of strip tests of V. cholerae O1 and O139 (Chaivisuthangkura et al, ; Pengsuk et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for food sample analysis, IFIs have higher false‐positive rates than with ELISA and PCR (Bohaychuk and others ), and their low sensitivity sometimes delays the results due to cultural enrichment necessity (Shim and others ; Sithigorngul and others ). A strip test using AuNPs as indicators for the detection of V. cholerae O1 was developed and evaluated in spiked seafood samples (Chaivisuthangkura and others ). Without cultural enrichment, bacterial concentrations of 5 × 10 5 to 10 6 CFU/mL in seafood samples were detected.…”
Section: Immunological‐based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%