2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2016.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of mineral reactive surface area estimates for prediction of reactivity of a multi-mineral sediment

Abstract: Our limited understanding of mineral reactive surface area contributes to significant uncertainties in quantitative simulations of reactive chemical transport in subsurface processes. Continuum formulations for reactive transport typically use a number of different approximations for reactive surface area, including geometric, specific, and effective surface area. In this study, reactive surface area estimates are developed and evaluated for their ability to predict dissolution rates in a well-stirred flow-thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
102
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Beckingham et al . [] used many reactive surface area models to identify the one that was best able to reproduce experimental results in CrunchFlow [ Steefel et al ., ] simulations, which also required the incorporation of a highly reactive volcanic glass phase and a specified grain‐size distribution. Still, research opportunities remain to more fully constrain the intricacies of reactive transport.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Beckingham et al . [] used many reactive surface area models to identify the one that was best able to reproduce experimental results in CrunchFlow [ Steefel et al ., ] simulations, which also required the incorporation of a highly reactive volcanic glass phase and a specified grain‐size distribution. Still, research opportunities remain to more fully constrain the intricacies of reactive transport.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the specific surface area for chlorite ranges between 3.4 and 4.4 m 2 g −1 for grain sizes from 125 to 300 m and 75 to 125 m, respectively [41]. Beckingham et al [42] report specific surface areas for biotite (0.5-4.7 m 2 g −1 , grain size range from 10 to 420 m), chlorite (2.8-7.6 m 2 g −1 , 10-250 m), and pyrite (0.03-1.1 m 2 g −1 , 10-250 m). Although surface area is strongly dependent on mineral morphology and grain size, it can be concluded that the reactive surface areas considered for the base case are typically around three orders of magnitude lower than literature values for specific surface areas, implying that the base case mineral reactivities to limit O 2 -ingress to 200 m are highly conservative, even taking into account the often large discrepancies between laboratory-measured specific surface areas and reactive surface areas in the field.…”
Section: O 2 Ingress and Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to literature data for oxidative mineral dissolution rates and SOM oxidation, effective rates on the order of 10 −15 to 10 −13 mol dm −3 bulk s −1 , as used for the base case, are very low. For example, utilizing rate data, mineral abundances, and effective surface areas reported by Beckingham et al [42], effective dissolution rates for pyrite, biotite, and chlorite in a volcanic sandstone are determined as 2.3 × 10 −9 , 2.1 × 10 −10 , and 2.7 × 10 −10 mol dm −3 bulk s −1 for pyrite, biotite, and chlorite, respectively. Mineral volume fractions associated with these calculations are 0.4, 2.6, and 1.2 dm 3 mineral dm −3 bulk for pyrite, biotite, and chlorite, respectively, within a factor of 5 of the volumetric fractions of the present study.…”
Section: O 2 Ingress and Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beckingham et al (2016) showed that the presence of a highly reactive volcanic glass phase indeed enhanced the chemical weathering rate of a volcanogenic sandstone. Deng et al (2017) indicated that preferential dissolution of highreactivity phases enhances fracture evolution in carbonaterich shales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%