To the Editor, We read with utmost interest the epidemiological study by Sajal Ajmani et al. that explores the prevalence and risk factors of hearing impairment among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and suggests that conductive hearing loss is more commonly observed in AS patients when compared to the control group. We are greatly appreciative of the editor for selecting this manuscript, and we extend our gratitude to the authors for providing insights into the hearing impairment status among AS patients. 1 We would like to share some perspectives on this article. First, we wish to inquire about the authors' definition and criteria for hearing impairment. It is common in clinical practice to adhere to the standards set forth by the World Health Organization's International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. 2 According to this classification, hearing thresholds of 16-25 dB HL are classified as mild hearing loss, while thresholds of 26-40 dB HL are considered moderate hearing loss. We posit that differences in hearing impairment criteria may have the potential to influence the study outcomes.Second, in addition to the evaluation of hearing loss in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients through Pure-tone audiometry and impedance audiometry, it is advisable to consider additional indicators for validation. These may include DPOAEs (Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission) testing, 3 as well as whether relevant diagnostic criteria have been provided by other specialists. It is recommended that this aspect be elaborated upon in greater detail for a more comprehensive understanding. 4 Third, the study might have some important residual confounders. We suggest further match or adjust known risk factors for hearing loss to reduce residual confounding bias, such as peripheral neuropathy, 5 various infections, and potentially ototoxic drugs. 6 Further subgroup analysis on these important covariates would be appreciated for clinical applications.In summary, we thank the authors for conducting this retrospective study. The results of the study would be more credible if the above issues are further explored.
AUTH O R CO NTR I B UTI O N SConceptualization and writing were performed by Hsin-Tien Wu.Writing and editing were performed by Renin Chang.