2015
DOI: 10.4238/2015.september.25.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of microsatellite loci from libraries derived from the wild diploid 'Calcutta 4' and 'Ouro' banana cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, different works have been carried out for characterization of SSR markers from M. balbisiana (Buhariwalla et al, 2005;Ravishankar et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2011) and M. acuminata (Amorim et al, 2012;Creste et al, 2006;Crouch et al, 1997Crouch et al, , 1998Miller et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010), whereas other studies have been focused on the development of SSR markers suitable for analysis of both species and/or hybrid cultivars (Brisibe & Ubi, 2020;Kaemmer et al, 1997;Lagoda et al, 1998;Ravishankar et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2015). In other publications, sets of primers previously developed have been used for molecular characterization of Musa varieties (Bawin et al, 2019;Durai et al, 2018;Grapin et al, 1998), including cultivars from certain regions as Brazil (Creste et al, 2003(Creste et al, , 2004, Malawi (Changadeya et al, 2012), East Africa (Nzawele et al, 2018;Onyango et al, 2008;Perrier et al, 2019), Indonesia (Retnoningsih et al, 2009), the Philippines (dela Cruz et al, 2020) or Tanzania (Mgonja et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, different works have been carried out for characterization of SSR markers from M. balbisiana (Buhariwalla et al, 2005;Ravishankar et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2011) and M. acuminata (Amorim et al, 2012;Creste et al, 2006;Crouch et al, 1997Crouch et al, , 1998Miller et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010), whereas other studies have been focused on the development of SSR markers suitable for analysis of both species and/or hybrid cultivars (Brisibe & Ubi, 2020;Kaemmer et al, 1997;Lagoda et al, 1998;Ravishankar et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2015). In other publications, sets of primers previously developed have been used for molecular characterization of Musa varieties (Bawin et al, 2019;Durai et al, 2018;Grapin et al, 1998), including cultivars from certain regions as Brazil (Creste et al, 2003(Creste et al, , 2004, Malawi (Changadeya et al, 2012), East Africa (Nzawele et al, 2018;Onyango et al, 2008;Perrier et al, 2019), Indonesia (Retnoningsih et al, 2009), the Philippines (dela Cruz et al, 2020) or Tanzania (Mgonja et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent research, many studies have been carried out on microsatellites on Musa spp. (Biswas et al, 2015;Christelova et al, 2016;Silva et al, 2015) providing information for further research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An insight of genetic make-up may contribute to information, vital for both breeders and consumers. Several methods have been used to investigate the genetic variability present in Musa germplasm (Silva et al, 2015;Hippolyte et al, 2010). The development and application of technologies based upon molecular markers provide the only tools that are able to reveal polymorphism at the DNA sequence level, which are adequate to detect genetic variability between individuals and within populations (Kresovich et al, 1995) which will facilitate breeding efforts to improve the crop against biotic and abiotic stresses (Rodrigues et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%