2019
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Mexican Bean Beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Host Selection, Survival, and Feeding Injury Among Snap Bean and Lima Bean Cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soybean was clearly the least preferred, with the lowest recaptures for all trials and factors. These results reflect past studies demonstrating the preference of E. varivestis to wax beans over most green snap bean and lima beans cultivars, and all soybeans (Friend and Turner 1931, Campbell and Brett 1966, Raina et al 1978, Nottingham and Kuhar in press). DT had more immigrated recaptures than all other cultivars, suggesting that it was the most attractive cultivar to dispersing E. varivestis .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soybean was clearly the least preferred, with the lowest recaptures for all trials and factors. These results reflect past studies demonstrating the preference of E. varivestis to wax beans over most green snap bean and lima beans cultivars, and all soybeans (Friend and Turner 1931, Campbell and Brett 1966, Raina et al 1978, Nottingham and Kuhar in press). DT had more immigrated recaptures than all other cultivars, suggesting that it was the most attractive cultivar to dispersing E. varivestis .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our goal was to use this information to determine the potential for these cultivars in trap cropping or push–pull strategies. The cultivars tested (‘Dragon’s Tongue’ [DT] purple wax snap, ‘Rocdor’ yellow wax snap, ‘Caprice’ green snap, ‘Fordhook’ bush lima, and ‘Hutchison’ field soybean) were chosen based on our corresponding study measuring cultivar susceptibility, in which we determined that each of the cultivars exhibit significantly different levels of attraction for oviposition by wild E. varivestis in field plots (Nottingham and Kuhar, in press). Here we examine two specific factors of host attraction important to trap cropping and push–pull strategies: 1) the ability of a cultivar to lure beetles out of another acceptable host cultivar; and 2) the ability of a cultivar to retain beetles from moving into other cultivars or offsite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%