2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of methods to estimate production, biomass and turnover of ectomycorrhizal mycelium in forests soils – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
162
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
3
162
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This large variation may derive from the factors regulating EMM production as well as from differences in the various methods used to assess mycelial biomass (ergosterol, phospholipid fatty acids, dry matter etc. ; see Wallander et al (2013)). Although EMM production data exist from a number of sites, there is a strong bias towards Norway spruce (P. abies) and southern Scandinavia and data from other areas and other forest types are needed.…”
Section: Exploration Typesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This large variation may derive from the factors regulating EMM production as well as from differences in the various methods used to assess mycelial biomass (ergosterol, phospholipid fatty acids, dry matter etc. ; see Wallander et al (2013)). Although EMM production data exist from a number of sites, there is a strong bias towards Norway spruce (P. abies) and southern Scandinavia and data from other areas and other forest types are needed.…”
Section: Exploration Typesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An underestimate of production combined with an overestimate of standing biomass would result in an underestimate of the rate of turnover. A solution to this problem may be to combine sequential harvesting of in-growth bags with a 13 CO 2 pulse labelling of the mycelium via the plant and analyses of 13 C in structural components of the mycelium such as glucosamine (for further technical discussions, see Wallander et al 2013).…”
Section: Estimation Of Standing Biomass and Turnover Of Emmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used polyester mycorrhizal mesh bags (10 × 6 × 2 cm, 38 μm mesh size) that allow the ingrowth of ectomycorrhizal mycelia but not of roots (Wallander et al 2001(Wallander et al , 2013, which were filled with 145 g of quartz sand. Due to the low nutritional value of this substrate, mycorrhizal mesh bags are assumed to predominantly contain mycorrhizal fungi (Wallander et al 2001).…”
Section: Mycorrhizal Fungal Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two soil cores per plot (n = 6) were taken to a depth of 40 cm. The amount of extramatrical mycorrhizal mycelia was estimated using the mesh bag technique (see Wallander et al, 2013 for a detailed description).…”
Section: Soil Respiration (Approach 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%