2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of methods to detect CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
45
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…23 An analysis of histological features is currently being performed, and these data are not being presented as part of this article.…”
Section: Treatment and Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 An analysis of histological features is currently being performed, and these data are not being presented as part of this article.…”
Section: Treatment and Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 It was shown that targeted NGS had the best limit of detection down to 1% in comparison to Sanger sequencing, fragment analysis and HRM, the latter being the least robust technique. However, it was discussed if a high sensitivity for CALR mutation detection is required since the frequency of patients with low mutation burdens was marginal (5%, 3/59 with <15% mutated reads).…”
Section: Next-generation Deep-sequencing Detects Multiple Clones Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified a total of 334 CALR-mutated MPN cases, as determined by fragment and/or sequence analysis. 7,13 Of these, 166 were heterozygous for rs1049481, 75 were homozygous GG and 93 were homozygous TT. The breakdown of these cases by CALR mutation type is given in Table 1.…”
Section: Constitutional Genetic Association With Calr Mutations?mentioning
confidence: 99%