2015
DOI: 10.4238/2015.january.16.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of methods of DNA extraction from Staphylococcus aureus in milk for use in real-time PCR

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability and performance of 4 methods of extracting DNA from Staphylococcus aureus (SAU) and the gene encoding bovine mitochondrial cytochrome B (BMCB) in milk samples from cows with subclinical mastitis for use in amplification by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Two milk samples were obtained from cows naturally infected with S. aureus and subjected to the following extraction methods: Qiagen DNA extraction kit; Axyprep DNA extraction kit; in silic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA from all presumptive S. aureus isolates was extracted using the conventional boiling method as previously described [57]. All extracted DNA was stored at −20 • C until used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Molecular Identification Of S Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA from all presumptive S. aureus isolates was extracted using the conventional boiling method as previously described [57]. All extracted DNA was stored at −20 • C until used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Molecular Identification Of S Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result represents the evolution of the microorganisms with regards to the development of resistance mechanisms. According to Dibbern, Botaro, Viziack, Silva and Santos (2015), the majority of mastitis cases are caused by bacteria, especially S. aureus, a microorganism capable of producing biofilm. Scherr, Heim, Morrison and Kielian (2014) define biofilm as a group of cells attached to a biotic or abiotic surface imbedded in a protective extracellular matrix, thus granting resistance to antimicrobial drugs used during the treatment of illness, as well as to disinfectants and the immune system of the host, allowing the infection to acquire a chronic nature (Arciola, Campoccia, Speziale, Montanaro, & Costerton, 2012;Guimarães et al, 2012;Tremblay, Caron, Blondeau, Messier, & Jacques, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lower performance could be due to the presence of fat in which some organisms may get trapped. [20] This sensitivity is on par with the bacterial loading commonly seen in contaminated samples, which ranges from 100 to 50,000 organisms/ml [21]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%