2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of MEGAN predicted biogenic isoprene emissions at urban locations in Southeast Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6). This is consistent with other studies comparing MEGAN 2.1 isoprene flux with measurements in the Sierra Nevada of northern California (Misztal et al, 2014) and also with modeling systems using MEGAN 2.1 isoprene emissions compared with ambient isoprene concentrations in Texas (Kota et al, 2015) and southern Missouri (Carlton and Baker, 2011). The airborne flux measurements of Misztal et al (2014) are lower than the Figure 6.…”
Section: Cmaq Estimates Compared With Cares and Bearpex Measurementssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6). This is consistent with other studies comparing MEGAN 2.1 isoprene flux with measurements in the Sierra Nevada of northern California (Misztal et al, 2014) and also with modeling systems using MEGAN 2.1 isoprene emissions compared with ambient isoprene concentrations in Texas (Kota et al, 2015) and southern Missouri (Carlton and Baker, 2011). The airborne flux measurements of Misztal et al (2014) are lower than the Figure 6.…”
Section: Cmaq Estimates Compared With Cares and Bearpex Measurementssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Model performance is similar to isoprene where BEIS estimates compare favorably with measurements, and MEGAN 2.1 emissions result in notable overestimates (Fig. S7) similar to previous studies (Kota et al, 2015). Methacrolein can further react in the atmosphere to form methacryloyl peroxynitrate (MPAN) which can form methacrylic acid epoxide (MAE) and subsequently secondary organic aerosol including aerosol methylglyceric acid, organic sulfates, and organic nitrates (Worton et al, 2013).…”
Section: Cmaq Estimates Compared With Cares and Bearpex Measurementssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We also compare the isoprene observations to a CAMx simulation with a recently released version of BEIS version 3.61 [Bash et al, 2015], which shows the best agreement with observations ( Figure S10); BEIS version 3.61 has improved land use and canopy representation. Similar to our study, Kota et al [2015] also showed an overestimate of isoprene using MEGAN version2.1 in southeast Texas. The comparison of observed ozone to values from the Beta simulation exhibits similar features as the comparison for the baseline simulation.…”
Section: Updated "Beta" Model Simulationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To effectively design pollution control strategies, the contributions of different emission sources to PM 2.5 concentrations are crucial. Source-oriented chemical transport models (CTMs) based on a tagged tracer technique have been developed and used for source apportionment of gases (Kota et al, 2014) and PM (Zhang and Ying, 2010;Kota et al, 2015;Ying et al, 2015) in the past. Guo et al (2017), which was the first study to use the source-oriented Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model in India, showed that the residential sector contributed the most (∼ 80 µg m −3 ) to total PM 2.5 , followed by the industrial sector (∼ 70 µg m −3 ) in 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%