2015
DOI: 10.5762/kais.2015.16.2.921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of mechanical properties and springback for embossed aluminum sheet - part I

Abstract: Embossed aluminum sheets were been used in heat insulation purpose for automative exhaust parts because of increasing their surface areas and stiffness reinforcement. However, there are many restrictions because of high rate of wrinkle occurrence on press working. We have performed the tensile and bending tests for embossed sheets to clarity its mechanical properties and springback characteristics. Embossed aluminum sheets showed a different flow stress after plastic yielding due to flattening the embossed con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elastic-plastic simulation was used; the material density was 2.7E-9 ton/mm 3 ; the Young modulus was 70 GPa; the Poisson ratio was 0.3; the stress-strain curve was evaluated by σ = Kε n with a strength coefficient (K) of 312 MPa and a strain hardening coefficient (n) of 0.3. The ABAQUS explicit finite element code was used with the anisotropic material parameters r 0 = 0.57, r 45 = 0.59, and r 90 = 0.65 (Kim et al, 2015a). The simulation results are well adaptive to the experiment results.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The elastic-plastic simulation was used; the material density was 2.7E-9 ton/mm 3 ; the Young modulus was 70 GPa; the Poisson ratio was 0.3; the stress-strain curve was evaluated by σ = Kε n with a strength coefficient (K) of 312 MPa and a strain hardening coefficient (n) of 0.3. The ABAQUS explicit finite element code was used with the anisotropic material parameters r 0 = 0.57, r 45 = 0.59, and r 90 = 0.65 (Kim et al, 2015a). The simulation results are well adaptive to the experiment results.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 86%