2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of MBR treated industrial wastewater quality before and after desalination by NF and RO processes for agricultural reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The removal of COD with all membranes is presented in Figure 3 , where the RO percentage removal of 92% and 99% for uncontrolled and controlled pH, respectively, were significantly higher than the UF and NF membranes ( p = 0.018 for UF, p = 0.013 for NF and p = 0.009 for RO; α = 0.05). This is consistent with a similar study of MBR/NF and MBR/RO membrane effluent rejection [ 26 ]. MBR is considered a relatively improved treatment process for the exclusions of COD compared to conventional activated sludge processes as a pre-treatment for NF and RO reuse [ 10 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The removal of COD with all membranes is presented in Figure 3 , where the RO percentage removal of 92% and 99% for uncontrolled and controlled pH, respectively, were significantly higher than the UF and NF membranes ( p = 0.018 for UF, p = 0.013 for NF and p = 0.009 for RO; α = 0.05). This is consistent with a similar study of MBR/NF and MBR/RO membrane effluent rejection [ 26 ]. MBR is considered a relatively improved treatment process for the exclusions of COD compared to conventional activated sludge processes as a pre-treatment for NF and RO reuse [ 10 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The earth may appear wet, but if the EC is high, then the available water to the vegetations will be less. The acceptable EC limits for effluent discharge and domestic water supply usage, according to South African guidelines, are 250 µS•cm −1 and 70 µS•cm −1 , respectively [26]. The results in Table 5 show that the removal of phosphate, phosphorous, and ammonia with MBR/NF270 and MBR/XLE membranes is within the specification guidelines for cooling and irrigation applications.…”
Section: Reuse Application For Wastewater Effluentmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MBR processes are usually considered as a pre-treatment step for NF and RO processes, because they exhibit high tolerance at total suspended solids of influent composition variation, and production of high effluent quality ( Table 3 in Refs. [47,48]) However, the membrane fouling is a major hurdle on applying MBR processes at larger scale. An approach to circumvent this hurdle is to increase the membranes' hydrophilicity via incorporating inorganic nanocrystals (nanofillers) in polymeric membranes, also named organic-inorganic mix-matrixed membranes (MMM) [49].…”
Section: Incorporation Of Nanofillers In Polymeric Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the literature, it is evident that in recent years, remarkable progress has been made in wastewater treatment via MBR technology. Wastewater reuse has been targeted 11,12 and a range of industrial wastewaters have been tested 13,14 . Of particular interest are highly polluting effluents from sectors, such as tanneries 15 and textiles 16,17 , as well as wastewaters with high salinity 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%