1999
DOI: 10.37855/jah.1999.v01i02.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of mango cultivars for arid-irrigated region of Punjab.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different mango varieties showed significant variation among themselves with respect to ascorbic acid content which ranges from 21.96 mg/100g (Safdar Pasand) to 43.17 mg/100g (Kohitoor). Significant variation in the ascorbic acid content of the different mango varieties were also earlier reported by Mitra et al (2000) and Sharma et al (1999).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Different mango varieties showed significant variation among themselves with respect to ascorbic acid content which ranges from 21.96 mg/100g (Safdar Pasand) to 43.17 mg/100g (Kohitoor). Significant variation in the ascorbic acid content of the different mango varieties were also earlier reported by Mitra et al (2000) and Sharma et al (1999).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Bhuyan and Guha (1995), experimented and found 16.22 to 24.14% TSS in 14 mango germplasm under the climatic conditions of Rajshahi. Sarder (1995), andJosan (1995) also reported that TSS varied depending upon germplasm.…”
Section: Quality Of Fiber On Seedmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Langra might be due to purely varietal character which is influenced by environments and locations also. This is the reason that when fruits of Mallika from the Abohar (Punjab) gave the more fruit size (16.80 x 12.10 cm) [17] and it was observed in reduced size (12.29 x 6.75 cm) at Sabour, Bihar [18], such variation in size of other cultivars from different localities were also reported by different researchers [19,20,21] and [16]. Further, it was observed the possible cause of differentiation in fruit size was due to the variation in characters of the pericarp like cell size, laticiferous canals, intercellular space etc.…”
Section: Fruit Breadth (Cm)mentioning
confidence: 99%