1994
DOI: 10.2527/1994.7292216x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of machine, technician, and interpreter effects on ultrasonic measures of backfat and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle3

Abstract: Before slaughter, 44 Hereford-sired steers were measured ultrasonically for backfat (UFAT) and longissimus muscle area (ULMA) between the 12th and 13th ribs by three technicians (TECH) using two different machines (MACH) on two consecutive days (DAY). Each TECH interpreted (INT) his own images in addition to other TECH images. The absolute values of the difference between the 2 DAY's ultrasound measurements for ULMA (magnitude of LMAR) and UFAT (magnitude of FATR) were analyzed with a model including fixed eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
72
2
11

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
72
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlation coefficients of the relationship between ultrasound measure and organ mass in knots (0.792-0.928) are comparable with those found for swans (Cygnus olor, 0.929;Sears 1988), dippers (Cinclus cinclus, 0.859;Newton 1993), and canaries (Serinus canaria, 0.927;Newton 1993) and also with the range of the correlation coefficients between the ultrasound measure and fat thickness or muscle area in beef cattle (Perkins et al 1992;Herring et al 1994). Values obtained in plovers were substantially lower (0.118-0.820), however.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Correlation coefficients of the relationship between ultrasound measure and organ mass in knots (0.792-0.928) are comparable with those found for swans (Cygnus olor, 0.929;Sears 1988), dippers (Cinclus cinclus, 0.859;Newton 1993), and canaries (Serinus canaria, 0.927;Newton 1993) and also with the range of the correlation coefficients between the ultrasound measure and fat thickness or muscle area in beef cattle (Perkins et al 1992;Herring et al 1994). Values obtained in plovers were substantially lower (0.118-0.820), however.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The three brands of equipment used in this study were equipped with different probes and screens, but repeatabilities generally were comparable (Table 2) and in the same range as found in previous studies (Perkins et al 1992;Herring et al 1994). However, while variation between equipment in the discrepancy between observed and predicted organ mass was small for pectoral muscles, when estimating stomach mass, the discrepancies appeared slightly higher for the Aloka equipment compared with Hitachi and Pie (Table 3).…”
Section: Sources Of Errormentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations