2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors associated renal adverse event prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study employed a subset of patients derived from the dataset of our earlier research, acting as the foundation for this study [ 16 ]. This cohort comprises cases from four distinct clinics, both secondary and tertiary care centers, spanning from October 1st, 2020, to October 30th, 2021.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study employed a subset of patients derived from the dataset of our earlier research, acting as the foundation for this study [ 16 ]. This cohort comprises cases from four distinct clinics, both secondary and tertiary care centers, spanning from October 1st, 2020, to October 30th, 2021.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a subgroup, uncontrolled DM was arbitrarily defined as patients with an A1c over 8%. Detailed definitions of specific diseases are available from our previous research [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors contrasted various classifiers to determine which performed the best across the various representations. The study in [13] aimed to use ML algorithms to identify risk factors for renal adverse events caused by renin-angiotensinaldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) medications. The researchers will use these findings to develop predictive models that can be used to identify patients at high risk of developing these adverse events so that they can be monitored and treated more closely.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was designedas a post-hoc analysis of our previously published study (10). All patient data was acquired using electronic medical records (EMR).…”
Section: Design Settings and The Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%