2012
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of lymph node metastases: Comparison of gadofluorine M‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted MRI in a rabbit VX2 rectal cancer model

Abstract: Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) dataset and a gadofluorine M-enhanced imaging dataset for identifying lymph node (LN) metastases in a rabbit rectal cancer model. Materials and Methods:VX2 carcinomas were injected into the rectum of 26 rabbits. Four weeks later, T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), pre-T1WI, DWI, and post-T1WI were performed. Two radiologists independently reviewed the DWI set (T2WI, pre-T1WI, DWI) and the gadofluorine M set (T2WI, pre-and post-T1WI) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59,66,74 Altogether, the majority of studies that investigated ADC as a biomarker to assess or predict response to treatment found significant results at one or more time points, although a subgroup (21%) of studies could not produce any statistically significant results. 49,51,75,76,[85][86][87]89,90 As a critical note, most study cohorts presented so far are small and single centre, and reported ADC and cut-off values show large variation and overlap between studies and have never been validated in prospective study cohorts. This stresses the need for standardization and multicentre validation studies.…”
Section: Nodal Restagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59,66,74 Altogether, the majority of studies that investigated ADC as a biomarker to assess or predict response to treatment found significant results at one or more time points, although a subgroup (21%) of studies could not produce any statistically significant results. 49,51,75,76,[85][86][87]89,90 As a critical note, most study cohorts presented so far are small and single centre, and reported ADC and cut-off values show large variation and overlap between studies and have never been validated in prospective study cohorts. This stresses the need for standardization and multicentre validation studies.…”
Section: Nodal Restagingmentioning
confidence: 99%