2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2008.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of logistic and polynomial models for fitting sandwich-ELISA calibration curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following 4 more washes the signal was developed using MB One-Step Substrate Reagent which was stopped after 30 minutes using the supplied stop solution and subsequently measured at 450 nm using a SpectraMax plate reader (Molecular Devices). The concentration of the analytes in supernatant was then calculated using a cubic logistic model as recommended by (Herman et al 2008).…”
Section: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (Elisa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following 4 more washes the signal was developed using MB One-Step Substrate Reagent which was stopped after 30 minutes using the supplied stop solution and subsequently measured at 450 nm using a SpectraMax plate reader (Molecular Devices). The concentration of the analytes in supernatant was then calculated using a cubic logistic model as recommended by (Herman et al 2008).…”
Section: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (Elisa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] To determine the limit of detection, we first obtained the standard deviation of the signals from the negative control samples. Next, we fitted the calibration data in Figure 3 B with a third-order polynomial [28] and obtained a high correlation coefficient of regression within our operating range (R 2 > 0.99). Finally, the standard deviation value was multiplied by 3 [29] and subtracted from the mean negative control reaction signal to arrive at limits of detection (LODs) of 72 and 62 fm in buffer and 20 % serum, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…3a). The data were fit using a 4-parameter logistic nonlinear regression model, as is typical for sandwich immunoassays 16 . We observed inter-assay percent coefficient of variation (%CV) below 20% for all of the tested biomarkers, indicating the high precision of our multiplex assay (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%