1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1986.tb00293.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of liver volume and liver function following hepatic resection in man

Abstract: ABSTRACT— In a longitudinal study liver volume and liver function were measured in a series of 12 patients undergoing partial liver resection for focal hepatic lesions. Ultrasonography revealed that liver volume, reduced by about 50% by the resection, progressively increased, and 6 months after surgery it returned to nearly normal values. A variable reduction in routine liver function tests was observed, possibly reflecting the influence of the different reserve synthetic capacity of the liver and, in the earl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the resected liver volume was less in the NAR group than the AR group despite similar tumor size, although postoperative changes in the above laboratory data were not evaluated. Considering that the resected liver volume is reported to influence postoperative liver regeneration, it is possible that the NAR offers advantages over AR with respect to the postoperative liver function [28][29][30]. Collectively, considering the similar outcome in AR and NAR, NAR seems to be more advantageous in hepatic resection for HCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the present study, the resected liver volume was less in the NAR group than the AR group despite similar tumor size, although postoperative changes in the above laboratory data were not evaluated. Considering that the resected liver volume is reported to influence postoperative liver regeneration, it is possible that the NAR offers advantages over AR with respect to the postoperative liver function [28][29][30]. Collectively, considering the similar outcome in AR and NAR, NAR seems to be more advantageous in hepatic resection for HCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[21][22][23] This discrepancy may be due to methodologic Total liver volume before and after procedures (a) and ratio of total liver volume after hepatectomies to that before any procedure (b). Each value is the mean±SD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three measurements of Max Long, Max AP and Max Trans (measurements 1–3) were described in multiple studies. However, none of these studies gave detailed information on the measurement technique 1 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%