1995
DOI: 10.1155/1995/47538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Liver Function Tests to Predict Operative Risk in Liver Surgery

Abstract: Despite numerous studies in the past it is not possible yet to predict postoperative liver failure and safe limits for hepatectomy. In this study the following liver function tests ICG-ER (indocyaninegreen elimination rate), GEC (galactose elimination capacity) and MEGX-F (monoethylglycinexylidid formation) are examined with regard to loss of liver tissue and prediction of operative risk. Liver function tests were assessed in 20 patients prior to liver resection and on the 10th. postoperative day. Liver and tu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proposal for a MARS treatment regimen, at least for PHLF, is the following. Before treatment the status and severity of liver failure is assessed on the basis of: (i) biochemical parameters like bilirubin, ammonia, urea/creatinine and coagulation factors like prothrombin time, factor V and/or INR, (ii) clinical parameters like hemodynamic stability, diuresis and neurological state like Glasgow Coma Scale and intracranial pressure, (iii) (liver) disease classification: Child‐Pugh score, MELD score and APACHE III score, (iv) CT‐scan to evaluate perfusion of the remnant liver and to measure remnant liver volume, (v) function tests such as indocyanine green (ICG) clearance (9, 22–26). We further advise to extend treatment times to maximal 24 h based on the experience described in the third patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposal for a MARS treatment regimen, at least for PHLF, is the following. Before treatment the status and severity of liver failure is assessed on the basis of: (i) biochemical parameters like bilirubin, ammonia, urea/creatinine and coagulation factors like prothrombin time, factor V and/or INR, (ii) clinical parameters like hemodynamic stability, diuresis and neurological state like Glasgow Coma Scale and intracranial pressure, (iii) (liver) disease classification: Child‐Pugh score, MELD score and APACHE III score, (iv) CT‐scan to evaluate perfusion of the remnant liver and to measure remnant liver volume, (v) function tests such as indocyanine green (ICG) clearance (9, 22–26). We further advise to extend treatment times to maximal 24 h based on the experience described in the third patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These substances include lidocaine, 73 galactose, 95 aminopyrine, 96 , amino acid, 97 , and methacetin. 98 None of these various tests have been proven to be superior than ICG-R15 for the prediction of PHLF-or PHLF-related mortality.…”
Section: Indocyanine Green Retention Rate At 15 Minmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GEC accurately assessed survival prognosis of patients with acute liver failure [5], chronic liver disease [6,7], and patients undergoing liver resection [8]. More interestingly, it has been shown that quantitative liver function tests such as the GEC are far more predictive of the remaining liver function following partial hepatectomy than measurements of liver volumes [911]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%