2020
DOI: 10.3390/environments7100084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Light Gradient Boosted Machine Learning Technique in Large Scale Land Use and Land Cover Classification

Abstract: The ability to rapidly produce accurate land use and land cover maps regularly and consistently has been a growing initiative as they have increasingly become an important tool in the efforts to evaluate, monitor, and conserve Earth’s natural resources. Algorithms for supervised classification of satellite images constitute a necessary tool for the building of these maps and they have made it possible to establish remote sensing as the most reliable means of map generation. In this paper, we compare three mach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, it achieves much higher accuracy than most boosting methods, resulting from the introduction of GOSS and EFB techniques. Lastly, the LightGBM algorithm performs well when trained with large datasets, with a faster training time than the XGBoost algorithm [93]. In terms of disadvantages, the LightGBM can overfit small training datasets easily as it performs better with large datasets.…”
Section: (4) Lightgbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, it achieves much higher accuracy than most boosting methods, resulting from the introduction of GOSS and EFB techniques. Lastly, the LightGBM algorithm performs well when trained with large datasets, with a faster training time than the XGBoost algorithm [93]. In terms of disadvantages, the LightGBM can overfit small training datasets easily as it performs better with large datasets.…”
Section: (4) Lightgbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have focused on land use/land cover classification in different scenarios. McCarty et al compared three different algorithms (random forest, SVM, and light GBM) for large-scale land use mapping (McCarty et al, 2020). In their classification sce-nario, seven classes were targeted, and the light GBM had the highest overall accuracy (65.3%) and random forest had the lowest overall efficiency (59.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LightGBM advertises faster training speed, low memory usage (Ke et al, 2017;McCarty et al, 2020), and in-depth control over boosting and model learning via tunable parameters. The latter point, though, requires the user to be confident in their understanding of each parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%