1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1979.tb05596.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of leg ulcer treatment with stereophotogrammetry.

Abstract: This report describes stereophotogrammetric measurements of leg ulcers. A basic technical description of the method and its application in a pilot study are presented. The clinical evaluation of the healing of leg ulcers is compared to the photogrammetrically determined parameters--edge length, surface area, and volume--of the ulcers, and seems to fulfil the need for an objective method in the evaluation of leg ulcer treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters chosen for assessment of the results of treatment were area and volume of the ulcers and bacteriological analyses. Area and volume were measured by stereophotogrammetry (2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters chosen for assessment of the results of treatment were area and volume of the ulcers and bacteriological analyses. Area and volume were measured by stereophotogrammetry (2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projection error which is caused when the naturally curved body surface is projected onto the flat image plane of a camera may be avoided by stereophotogrammetry. Bulstrode et al (1986) and Erikson et al (1979 and1984) take two photographs of the lesion using a specialized stereocamera that is both camera and projector. After taking the photographs and processing the film, the resulting transparencies are placed in the camera again.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other function of wound assessment is to acquire data that permits comparison of wounds, either from observations made in the same wound on different occasions, or comparisons of different wounds, as in clinical studies of wound treatment or wound healing. While the information needed to fulfil the requirements of the basic clinical examination can be gleaned from the observation of a number of purely subjective variables, that required for comparative studies must be objective and reproducible (3,13). No review of the methods available for the clinical assessment of open wounds in human subjects appears to have been published previously and this paper aims to describe those available and indicate potential difficulties in their use and interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%